The Name and Nature of “Chinese-Language Philosophy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7958816 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xiaobo Yang (0000-0002-1480-2085, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 369-387 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy East and West (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8221 • E-ISSN: 1529-1898 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2025.a958930 |
| OpenAlex | W4409774447 |
| Language | EN |
In recent years, a distinctive trend known as “Chinese-language philosophy” ( Hanyu zhexue 漢語哲學) has emerged, signifying a paradigm shift in Chinese philosophical studies. This movement seeks to re-establish the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy in a novel manner. While it has gained substantial traction within Chinese academia, it has found little resonance among international scholars of Chinese philosophy. This prompts a critical examination: What does “Chinese-language philosophy” encompass? What were the circumstances of its emergence and the reasons for its prominence within Chinese academia? Is Chinese philosophy inherently a language-specific philosophy? These questions form the core of our exploration, intending to clarify the name and nature of “Chinese-language philosophy.” We caution against an overemphasis on the role of language in philosophy, as it may lead to a language-centric ontology that overlooks the fundamental underpinnings shared by all philosophical traditions across cultures and inherent in all human languages—namely, the lived experiences and social practices of human beings
Archaeology · China · Chinese philosophy · Epistemology · Linguistics · Chinese history and philosophy · Education, Philosophy, and Society · Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond · History · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |