Notes and Discussions/Discussion
Some Reflections on Constantine, Dalmatius Caesar, and CI 5.17.7
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7959520 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Moysés Marcos (0000-0003-3339-1039, corresponding author), Marcos Marcos (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 184 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Phoenix (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8299 • E-ISSN: 1929-4883 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7834/phoenix.73.1-2.0184 |
| OpenAlex | W3105102895, W4288930755 |
| Language | EN |
Roman imperial legislation remains a critical source of historical evidence on emperors, especially so for those emperors who had short reigns that are not well attested elsewhere, such as Dalmatius Caesar (335–337). One law is reconsidered here in terms of its dating and place of issuance in order to reinforce how we should understand this emperors role
Ancient history · Economics · Legislation · Mathematics education · Order (exchange) · Political science · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|