Renewable energy expansion or the preservation of national energy sovereignty? Norwegian renewable energy policy meets resource nationalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7971631 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susanne Therese Hansen (0000-0002-3709-128X, NTNU Samfunnsforskning), Eric Moe (0000-0001-8909-3714, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 99 |
| Pages | 102760 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0962-6298 • E-ISSN: 1873-5096 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102760 |
| OpenAlex | W4300970632 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 21 |
Proponents of renewable energy often argue that renewables bolster national energy sovereignty. Most of the scholarship however focuses on security of supply, imports and enhanced domestic production, not on exports. How does exporting renewable energy resources affect sovereignty? Here, we turn our attention to Norway, a country that is already self-sufficient in renewables, and where renewable energy expansion is primarily directed at exports. Drawing on resource nationalist scholarship we empirically scrutinize key Norwegian renewable energy debates and show how the Norwegian renewable energy debates do not include notions of renewables bolstering sovereignty. On the contrary, they vary between portraying the relationship between renewables and sovereignty as a non-relationship, where renewables are immaterial to sovereignty, or an adverse relationship, where renewable expansion is perceived to weaken, rather than strengthen, sovereignty. The fear of being locked into an asymmetric dependency relationship with an EU that gradually wrests away Norwegian sovereignty over natural resources triggers resource nationalist imaginaries and is a powerful brake on renewable energy expansion. Resource nationalism is also fueled by claims of green grabbing and attacks on local self-determination. Our findings signal that renewable expansion may trigger political and popular backlashes, and that resource nationalist claims about abstained sovereignty may constitute considerable obstacles to renewable energy transitions
Economic system · Economics · Economy · Nationalism · Natural resource · Natural resource economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Renewable energy · Renewable resource · Resource curse · Sovereignty · Energy and Environment Impacts · Engineering · Global Energy Security and Policy · Law · Natural Resources and Economic Development
Conditions for just offshore wind energy
Making the energy connection
Hesitation at increasing integration
Politics in the energy-security nexus
Interrelations between security and the zero‐carbon energy transition in the Finnish and Norwegian Arctic
Saved by the snowy owl
The Lithium Road. Political practices in favor of extractive infrastructures in the Bolivian Altiplano
Does renewable energy development enhance energy security
When regional energy cooperation fails
A multi-level discourse analysis of Swedish wind power resistance, 2009-2022
Seams of power
What is Political Discourse Analysis?
Simulating Sovereignty
Geography and resource nationalism
Energy infrastructure and the fate of the nation
Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark
Resource nationalism
Antinomies of community
The impossible energy trinity
Theorizing Energy Geographies
European Union agencies and their management boards
The Legitimacy Challenges for New Modes of Governance
Kraftmangel i horisonten
Resource geography II
Extracting sovereignty
Material constraints to popular imaginaries
Reworking the Spaces of Indigeneity
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |