Resource Inequalities and Regional Variation in Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961-1986
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7972149 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Stacia L Haynie (Louisiana State University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1995 |
| Volumen | 48 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 371-380 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1995-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Political Research Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/106591299504800208 |
| OpenAlex | W2171582249 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 11 |
| Referencias citadas | 8 |
Research on litigation outcomes suggests that success is related to the level of resources available to the parties in conflict. For more developed socie ties, the "haves" appear to win more often. Research on the Philippine Supreme Court finds that the "have nots" appear to have a significant advantage, particularly for some issue areas. While these studies find inter national variations in the effects of resources on litigation outcomes, in tranational variation has not been explored. This analysis investigates the relationship between regional bias, resource inequalities, and litigation outcomes before the Philippine Supreme Court for certain economic is sues. The results indicate that there is a greater likelihood of success for individuals who challenge corporations or the government, and reside in the least developed region of the country
Demographic economics · Economics · Government (linguistics · Inequality · Political science · Resource (disambiguation · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Variation (astronomy · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Judicial Review of Executive Power in the Singaporean Context, 1965–2012
Do the “Haves” come out ahead in China's prisons? – An empirical study of China's commutation procedures
Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Resource Disparity in Public‐Land Usurpation Litigation in Taiwan
Business, Politics, and Social Relationships in the Philippines
Building an Integrated Model of Trial Court Decision Making
Experienced Advocates and Litigation Outcomes
Whither repeat players? Litigation experience and success in court
Where Have All of the Pro‐Choice Lawyers Gone? An Analysis of Post‐Roe Reproductive Rights Lawyering
The Two Motifs of "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead" and Its Heirs
Do the "Haves" Still Come Out Ahead? Resource Inequalities in Ideological Courts
Repeat Players, the Law, and Social Change
Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal
Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals
Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court
Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts
The Public Ordering of Private Relations
Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead
Do The "Haves" Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970
Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,41 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1999 - 2023 (25) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 11 |