Nato–Russia Relations and the Chinese Factor
An Ignored Variable
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7973490 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elena Kropatcheva |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 149-160 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3268 • E-ISSN: 1467-9256 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9256.12019 |
| OpenAlex | W1589070227 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 13 |
NATO–Russia relations have usually been considered in isolation from the broader changing international context, but bipolarity no longer reflects reality. This essay revisits the NATO–Russia relationship by placing it in the context of ‘emerging powers’, in particular China. It demonstrates that the China factor has begun – often indirectly, but significantly – to affect Russia's NATO policy and NATO–Russia relations. Despite mistrust and problems, there is also considerable potential for co-operation among these three actors. While problems in NATO–Russia relations cannot be explained by the Chinese variable alone, it nevertheless offers new insights into some of the issues
China · Context (archaeology · International relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
The Elusive Balance
Neoclassical realism and identity
International Security in Practice
Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy
World Out of Balance
Axis of Convenience. Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics
Understanding Nato in the 21st century
Using the neo-classical realism paradigm to predict Russian foreign policy behaviour as a complement to using resources
The Sources of Russia's Insecurity
Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2019 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |