Demystifying Reviewing
The Whys and Hows
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7973792 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Celeste Montoya (0000-0002-2115-5218, University of Colorado Boulder, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 625-629 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics & Gender (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1743-923X • E-ISSN: 1743-9248 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1743923x2300017x |
| OpenAlex | W4367846131 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 1 |
Peer review is a key component of academic publishing, meant to maintain the integrity of the process. Peer reviewers help editors evaluate research—assessing the quality, validity, and original contribution of manuscripts submitted for publication. At its best, peer review can also help raise the quality of published research by providing authors with constructive expert feedback that helps them further develop and polish their project and its presentation
Computer security · Constructive · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Key (lock · Peer review · Political science · Presentation (obstetrics · Process (computing · Publishing · Quality (philosophy · Academic Writing and Publishing · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |