Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The European union's common foreign policy

The Role of the Commission in an “Intergovernmental” Process

Bibliographic Data

ID7974474
AuthorsMartin Holland (0000-0002-1843-1234, Christ University, corresponding author)
Year1997
Volume24
Issue2
Pages5-20
Publication date1997-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitikon (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0258-9346 • E-ISSN: 1470-1014
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02589349708705045
OpenAlexW2001520380
LanguageEN
References cited5

The importance of South Africa's relations with the European Union (EU) is well established. What is perhaps less well understood is the complexity that underlays the foreign policy‐making process within the EU. South Africa's own form of consultation and consensus style of decision‐making, albeit extensive by nation‐state standards, pails when confronted by the multi‐layered process of foreign policy‐making in the EU. The current negotiations between South Africa and the European Union over the “free trade” versus “development and trade” options makes this study of Europe's foreign policy making process both timely and important. To understand the present negotiations it is useful to examine the more recent past, in particular the 1993–4 EU joint action that has been instrumental in shaping contemporary policy. It is more than twenty five years since Henry Kissinger drew attention to what remains an unresolved problem by asking the question – who speaks for Europe in foreign affairs? The establishment of a spokesperson to perform this function in the 1997 Amsterdam treaty revisions has done little to clarify this central issue. The future spokesperson will be a bureaucrat drawn from the Council Secretariat, not an international statesperson and, as such, can hardly been seen as speaking “for Europe”. The actors in the EU's decision‐making process are diverse. They include the individual fifteen member state governments; the collective EU institution the Council of Ministers; the diplomatic representatives of COREPER (Committee of Permanent Representatives); the Commission; the European Parliament and national parliaments; and, arguably, even the Court of Justice if the legal basis for action requires a treaty competence. Add to this the non‐institutional factors such as domestic and European interest groups and the more general world system or realpolitik factors and the difficulty of Europe “speaking with one voice” becomes all too apparent

Commission · Council of Ministers · Economics · European integration · European union · Foreign policy · International trade · Member state · Member states · Negotiation · Parliament · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Treaty · Treaty of Lisbon · EU Law and Policy Analysis · European Union Policy and Governance · Global Politics and Economy · Law · Public Administration

  • European Political Co-operation

    Simon J Nuttall•European Political Co-operation•1992

  • The European communities as an actor in international society

    Paul Taylor•Journal of European Integration•1982

  • Foreign policy implementation

    Linda B Miller•International Affairs•1986

  • Managing the Political Agenda

    Joan K Stringer, Jeremy Richardson et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•1980

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae