Nationalising indigenous peoples, legalising indigenous lands
A (post)colonial critique of the land demarcation process in Brazil by the analysis of the Guarani-Mbyá case
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7981541 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria Beatriz Correa Neves (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Marco Antonio Calil Machado (0000-0003-3273-9910, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 163-175 |
| Publication date | 2017-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Postcolonial Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1368-8790 • E-ISSN: 1466-1888 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13688790.2017.1360723 |
| OpenAlex | W2740828107 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The Brazilian 1988 constitution recognises indigenous peoples as ‘first and natural owners of Brazilians land’ and the 231st Article ensures their right to special territories where they could live their culture and traditions without colonising presence. The authentication of these territories, however, requires Public Power promotion, which lies on colonising, juridical accounts and depends on anthropological, scientifically historical research. Our argument here is that the bureaucratisation of the land demarcation process is only possible within a context of epistemological advantage of science, i.e. modernity, which ignores indigenous territory and time conceptions. We will also argue that this bureaucratisation has been contributing to the (neo)colonisation of the territory by retarding the recognition and protection of indigenous rights
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Colonialism · Colonisation · Colonization · Constitution · Environmental ethics · Ethnology · Geography · Indigenous · Land rights · Modernity · Political science · Sociology · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law · Land Rights and Reforms · Law · Philosophy · Ecology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |