Navigating complex decision spaces
Problems and paradigms in sequential choice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7983216 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew M Walsh (0000-0002-1457-3016, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base), John R Anderson (0000-0002-8377-548X, Carnegie Mellon University) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 140 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 466-486 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0033455 |
| PMID | 23834192 |
| PMCID | PMC4309984 |
| OpenAlex | W1998992789 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 28 |
To behave adaptively, we must learn from the consequences of our actions. Doing so is difficult when the consequences of an action follow a delay. This introduces the problem of temporal credit assignment. When feedback follows a sequence of decisions, how should the individual assign credit to the intermediate actions that comprise the sequence? Research in reinforcement learning provides 2 general solutions to this problem: model-free reinforcement learning and model-based reinforcement learning. In this review, we examine connections between stimulus-response and cognitive learning theories, habitual and goal-directed control, and model-free and model-based reinforcement learning. We then consider a range of problems related to temporal credit assignment. These include second-order conditioning and secondary reinforcers, latent learning and detour behavior, partially observable Markov decision processes, actions with distributed outcomes, and hierarchical learning. We ask whether humans and animals, when faced with these problems, behave in a manner consistent with reinforcement learning techniques. Throughout, we seek to identify neural substrates of model-free and model-based reinforcement learning. The former class of techniques is understood in terms of the neurotransmitter dopamine and its effects in the basal ganglia. The latter is understood in terms of a distributed network of regions including the prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobes, cerebellum, and basal ganglia. Not only do reinforcement learning techniques have a natural interpretation in terms of human and animal behavior but they also provide a useful framework for understanding neural reward valuation and action selection
Action selection · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Machine learning · Markov decision process · Markov process · Perception · Reinforcement · Reinforcement learning · Sequence learning · Artificial Intelligence · Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder · Computer Science · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology
Human problem solving
The principles of psychology.
Stochastic models for learning.
Reinforcement Learning
A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making
The neural basis of human error processing
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.
Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance
Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans
Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control
Predictive Reward Signal of Dopamine Neurons
Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers
The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning.
Model-Based Influences on Humans' Choices and Striatal Prediction Errors
Conflict monitoring and decision making
Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control
Specific impairments of planning
The Neural Basis of Error Detection
Remembering the past to imagine the future
The debate over dopamine’s role in reward
A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward
A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation
Time Discounting and Time Preference
Differential errors in animal mazes
A critical review of latent learning and related experiments
A re‐examination of melioration and rational choice
Utility maximization and melioration
Melioration
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |