Reading against the grain
A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of European Commission communications on migration within Tunisia (2017–23)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7987493 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Boutheina Ben Ghozlen (0009-0008-2078-8014, Tunis El Manar University, corresponding author), Mounir Triki (University of Sfax) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 111-133 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Crossings Journal of Migration and Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2040-4344 • E-ISSN: 2040-4352 |
| Publisher | Intellect (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1386/cjmc_00107_1 |
| OpenAlex | W7082662378 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 16 |
The issue of illegalized migration is now more pressing than ever, particularly in regions like Europe and North Africa. Against this backdrop, this article aims to probe into the dynamics of the European Union’s policy agenda on migration within Tunisia, a key country of origin and transit for migrants crossing the European borders in an unauthorized way. Using a corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis approach, the research investigates a 10,000-word corpus of the European Commission (EC) communications on this topic over the period 2017–23. Specifically, this work combines corpus linguistics methods – concordance, collocation and collocation networks – with the critical discourse analysis (CDA) notions of topoi and topics. The collocation analysis revealed the salience of the topic of legality in the Commission communications, constructing a two-part migration discourse that contrasts the perils of irregularized migration with the merits of legal alternatives. The European Union’s security vs. human rights dilemma was also clearly discernible in the corpus, critically setting securitization policies against humanitarian and democratic values. Equally important, findings uncovered the solution-oriented, pluralistic and comprehensive nature of the European approach to migration within Tunisia and the entire North African region. The study has theoretical and practical implications for the growing body of corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) on migration. Its results can also inform future EU–Tunisia public and policy discourses around the complex phenomenon of unauthorized migration, with a view to better navigating emerging challenges
Critical discourse analysis · Critical reading · Discourse analysis · Eurocentrism · European union · Exceptionalism · Human rights · Principle of legality · Securitization · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Geological Modeling and Analysis · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding
Communicating Europe
The shapes of collocation
Constructing Immigrants
Tunisia’s migration politics throughout the 2011 revolution
Geopolitics as a migration governance strategy
Along the Borgesian Frontier
News Wholesalers as Churnalists
How do executives communicate about crises? A framework for comparative analysis
Unpacking the politics of great power responsibility
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
Security or insecurity? Representations of the UK border in public and policy discourses
| Highly cited | No |
|---|