Geopolitics and migration
The European Union’s misstep
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7989438 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michela Ceccorulli (0000-0002-9805-4087, University of Bologna, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Politics and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2374-5126 • E-ISSN: 2374-5118 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23745118.2025.2583071 |
| OpenAlex | W4416557958 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 28 |
In recent years, the European Union (EU) has increasingly emphasised a strategic dimension of migration. This strategic framing has facilitated the adoption of two novel instruments in EU migration governance: measures to address the so-called instrumentalisation of migration and a mechanism to ensure mandatory solidarity among Member States. Both measures were incorporated into the 2024 Regulation addressing situations of crisis and force majeure. Against the backdrop of these unprecedented developments, this article contributes to the Special Issue’s effort to explore the modalities and implications of an actor-driven geopoliticisation of migration by EU institutions. Drawing on the conceptual framework introduced in the Introduction (Andrione-Moylan, Raube, and Wolfs, this Special Issue), the article examines the discourses, policies, and institutional positioning of EU actors – beginning with the developments that followed the 2021 Belarus border crisis, when a clear link between migration and hybrid threats was first articulated. The article argues that EU actors have increasingly adopted a geopolitical language on migration, highlighting its potential to disrupt the Union and its Member States. Yet this shift raises critical concerns. The actor-driven geopoliticisation of migration has reinforced a securitisation paradigm previously invoked to justify an expanded EU role in the field. However, more than in past instances, this trajectory remains partial, ambiguous, and potentially detrimental to the European integration process. These preliminary findings call for further scholarly reflection and investigation
European union · Framing (construction · Geopolitics · Member states · Modalities · Solidarity · Central European and Russian historical studies · Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Europe as Empire
EU Policy towards Ukraine
Migration Diplomacy in World Politics
Refugee flows and terrorism in the European Union
It is like déjà vu all over again’ an inside analysis of the management of EU migration reform
The Ukraine war and the emergence of the European commission as a geopolitical actor
Political geography III
Migration diplomacy in the Global South
The impact of the Russian war against Ukraine on the reform of the common European asylum system
Interventions in the new political geographies of the European ‘neighborhood
Geostrategies, geopolitics and ontological security in the Eastern neighbourhood
Rebordering Europe
Reconfiguring sovereignty
External borders and internal freedoms
The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy
Back to Schengen
Debordering and re-bordering in the refugee crisis
Geopolitical EU? The EU's Wartime Assistance to Ukraine
Frames and Issue Linkage
The New Pact on Migration
Immigration, refugees, and foreign policy
Making and Unmaking Refugees
Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin
The Geopolitics of Migration and Mobility
The Geopoliticisation of the EU's Eastern Partnership
Militarized governance of migration in the Mediterranean
The EU and migration in the Mediterranean
The spiralling of the securitisation of migration in the EU
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |