Belief systems enforcing female genital mutilation in Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID7990849
AuthorsYussif Alhassan (0000-0003-4155-546X, Coventry University), Yussif Nagumse Alhassan, Hazel Barrett (0000-0002-5474-0077, Coventry University), Katherine E Brown (0000-0001-6378-2124), Katherine Brown (0000-0002-4717-3377, Coventry University), Kayleigh Kwah (0000-0003-2307-1285, Coventry University)
EditorsDan Reisel
Year2016
Volume9
Issue1
Pages29-40
Publication date2016-03-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2056-4902 • E-ISSN: 2056-4910
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/ijhrh-05-2015-0015
OpenAlexW2330049745
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited14

Purpose – Despite numerous studies on FGM, little is known about belief systems that support FGM in the EU. The purpose of this paper is to explore the dynamic nature of belief systems and enforcement mechanisms that perpetuate FGM among three African migrant communities in the EU. Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on data collected through community-based participatory action research in three communities: Eritrean and Ethiopian community in Palermo, Italy; Guinea Bissauan community in Lisbon, Portugal; and Senegalese and Gambian community in Banyoles, Spain. A total of 24 FGDs and 70 in-depth narrative interviews were conducted for the research. Findings – The research finds that belief systems supporting the practice of FGM among African migrants in the European diaspora are similar to those in their home countries. Beliefs structured around religion, sexuality, decency, marriage and socialisation are particularly significant in perpetuating FGM in the study migrant communities. These are enforced through sanctions and social expectations from the migrants’ home and host communities. Research limitations/implications – Members of the migrant communities that were the focus of this research are ethnically diverse; therefore it is possible that differences in the practice of and views on FGM by various ethnicities may have been masked. Also, due to close linkages between the migrants and their home countries it was hard to delineate beliefs that are specific to the host countries. In addition, it was difficult to assess the level of education of the migrants and how this may have impacted on their beliefs due to their contrasting and inconsistent educational backgrounds. Originality/value – This paper provides evidence to show that the practice of FGM among migrants in the EU is driven by both social norms and individual (parent) behaviour and therefore there is a need for interventions to focus on individual behaviour change and social norm transformation techniques. It also suggests that beliefs around FGM have remained socially significant among migrants despite their exposure to European culture because such beliefs are used to promote the moral standards of girls, marriageability of women, respectability of families, and the assertion of cultural and religious identity in the migrants’ new environment. The paper further underscores the role of migrants’ European context as well as the home country in strengthening beliefs that perpetuate FGM in the EU

Diaspora · Ethnic group · Focus group · Human sexuality · Participatory action research · Political science · Sanctions · Sociology · Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues · Gender Studies · Law in Society and Culture · Marriage and Sexual Relationships

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub