Stock market reactions to a sovereign wealth fund's broad-based public sustainability engagement
European evidence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7991529 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Florian Habermann (0000-0003-1982-6796, University of Lausanne, corresponding author), Tobias Steindl (0000-0003-0767-6970, University of Regensburg) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 231 |
| Pages | 106915-106915 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0167-2681 • E-ISSN: 1879-1751 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106915 |
| OpenAlex | W4407053214 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 64 |
This study examines investor reactions to a broad-based public engagement by the world's largest sovereign wealth fund (SWF). We use the SWF's announcement to vote against firms with insufficient sustainability performance in an event study comprising 1,169 portfolio firms headquartered in Europe. The results show an average negative reaction of USD 39.99 million to the announcement. The negative effect is concentrated in portfolio firms with low sustainability performance measured by Refinitiv's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) score. Focusing on the SWF's voting share, we find that firms with low sustainability performance and a high voting share experience the most negative market reaction. Notably, the moderating effect of ESG score uncertainty becomes apparent, as firms with both low sustainability performance and low ESG score uncertainty experience more pronounced negative stock market reactions. In contrast, firms with low performance and high uncertainty show no statistically significant effect. Several robustness tests—including a regression discontinuity in time design—confirm our results. Overall, our findings reveal that broad-based public sustainability engagement can exert pressure on European portfolio firms, suggesting that this form of indirect engagement complements direct engagement strategies in their objective to enhance firms’ sustainability performance. Our findings have valuable implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers interested in understanding the evolving landscape of investor-firm interactions
Business · Economics · Financial economics · Financial system · Geography · Market economy · Sovereign wealth fund · Stock (firearms · Stock exchange · Stock market · Sustainability · Market Dynamics and Volatility · State Capitalism and Financial Governance · Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds · Finance
Regression Discontinuity in Time
Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty
Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator
The price of sin
The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices
Event Studies in Management Research
Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs
Corporate Social Performance and the Likelihood of Bankruptcy
The Regulatory Dynamics of Sustainable Finance
Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |