Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Estimating the Between-Issue Variation in Party Elite Cue Effects

Bibliographic Data

ID7995044
AuthorsBen M Tappin (0000-0002-3826-8016, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume86
Issue4
Pages862-885
Publication date2022-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfac052
OpenAlexW4318765542
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited36

Party elite cues are among the most well-established influences on citizens’ political opinions. Yet, there is substantial variation in effect sizes across studies, constraining the generalizability and theoretical development of party elite cues research. Understanding the causes of variation in party elite cue effects is thus a priority for advancing the field. In this paper, I estimate the variation in party elite cue effects that is caused simply by heterogeneity in the policy issues being examined, through a reanalysis of data from existing research combined with an original survey experiment comprising 34 contemporary American policy issues. My estimate of the between-issue variation in effects is substantively large, plausibly equal to somewhere between one-third and two-thirds the size of the between-study variation observed in the existing literature. This result has important implications for our understanding of party elite influence on public opinion and for the methodological practices of party elite cues research

Developmental psychology · Elite · Generalizability theory · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Sociology · Statistics · Survey data collection · Variation (astronomy · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Law · Social Psychology

  • Does informing partisans about partisan bias reduce partisan bias

    Diogo Ferrari•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Balancing relevance and rigor

    Open Access•Michael A Xenos, Sedona Chinn et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • Comparing the persuasiveness of role-playing large language models and human experts on polarized U.S. political issues

    Open Access•Kobi Hackenburg, Lujain Ibrahim et al.•AI & Society•2026

  • Regulating campus speech

    Sarah Boonstoppel, Ethan D Boldt et al.•The Social Science Journal•2024

  • The effect of real‐news party cues

    Open Access•Rasmus Skytte•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Stand by Those who Share our Values” – How Refugees Fleeing the Taliban Improved European Attitudes Toward Immigration

    Open Access•Joris Frese•Comparative Political Studies•2026

  • Estimating the causal effects of cognitive effort and policy information on party cue influence

    Open Access•Ben M Tappin, Ryan T Mckay et al.•Political Psychology•2026

  • The Effects of Covid-19 Infection on Opposition to Covid-19 Policies

    Open Access•Zachary P Dickson, Tevfik Murat Yildirim•Political Communication•2025

  • Generalizing Survey Experiments Using Topic Sampling

    Open Access•Clifford, Thomas J Leeper et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Open Access•Sam Fuller, Nicolás De La Cerda et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • The Limits (and Strengths) of Single-Topic Experiments

    Open Access•Clifford, Scott Clifford et al.•Political Analysis•2025

  • Estimators for Topic-Sampling Designs

    Open Access•Clifford, Scott Clifford et al.•Political Analysis•2024

  • Winning Votes and Changing Minds

    Open Access•Markus Kollberg, Benjamin E Lauderdale et al.•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Why some districts march more

    Open Access•Marie-Therese Meye•Journal of Peace Research•2025

  • Elite Cues and Noncompliance

    Open Access•Zachary P Dickson, Sara B Hobolt•American Political Science Review•2025

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Follow the Leader?

    Gabriel S Lenz•Follow the leader?•2012

  • Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

    Open Access•Andrew Gelman, Jennifer Hill•Data Analysis Using Regression…•2006

  • Statistical Rethinking

    Richard Mcelreath•Statistical Rethinking•2020

  • The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver

    Open Access•Alexander Coppock, Seth J Hill et al.•Science Advances•2020

  • Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy

    Open Access•Leaf Van Boven, Phillip J Ehret et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2018

  • BRMS

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Heterogeneity of Research Results

    Open Access•Audrey Helen Linden, Alexandre Passant et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2021

  • Partisan Barriers to Bipartisanship

    Open Access•Phillip J Ehret, Leaf Van Boven et al.•Social Psychological and…•2018

  • Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents

    Open Access•Alexander Coppock, Oliver Mcclellan•Research & Politics•2019

  • The Generalizability of Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Kevin J Mullinix, Thomas J Leeper et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2015

  • Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Alexander Coppock•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity

    Bert N Bakker, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • Assessing the Influence of Political Parties on Public Opinion

    Rune Slothuus•Political Communication•2016

  • When Do Partisans Stop Following the Leader

    Alexander Agadjanian•Political Communication•2021

  • The Effects of Issue Salience, Elite Influence, and Policy Content on Public Opinion

    David J Ciuk, Berwood A Yost et al.•Political Communication•2016

  • How Public Opinion Information Changes Politicians’ Opinions and Behavior

    Open Access•Julie Sevenans•Political Behavior•2021

  • Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences

    Open Access•Cindy D Kam•Political Behavior•2005

  • Government policy and citizen passion

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Political Behavior•1990

  • Motivated Reasoning and Political Parties

    Open Access•Michael Bang Petersen, Martin Skov et al.•Political Behavior•2013

  • Mapping the Boundaries of Elite Cues

    Alexandra Guisinger, Elizabeth N Saunders•International Studies Quarterly•2017

  • External Validity

    Open Access•Michael G Findley, Kyosuke Kikuta et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2021

  • Polarizing Cues

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • On the Meaning of Survey Reports of Roll‐Call “Votes

    Open Access•Seth J Hill, Gregory A Huber•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • The Causal Effects of Elite Position‐Taking on Voter Attitudes

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Daniel M Butler•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives

    Open Access•Cheryl Boudreau, Scott A Mackenzie•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies

    Open Access•James Adams, Michael Clark et al.•British Journal of Political…•2004

  • Hard Issues, Core Values and Vertical Constraint

    Open Access•Philip H Pollock, Stuart A Lilie et al.•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • Party Over Policy

    Geoffrey L Cohen•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Information and Issue Constraints on Party Cues

    Open Access•Dennis Chong, Kevin J Mullinix•American Politics Research•2019

  • Following the Party's Lead

    Ted Brader, Joshua A Tucker•Comparative Politics•2012

  • The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • Demand Effects in Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Jonathan Mummolo, Erik Peterson•American Political Science Review•2019

  • The Two Faces of Issue Voting

    Open Access•E G Carmines, James A Stimson•American Political Science Review•1980

  • Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America

    Open Access•Michael Barber, John Collins Pope•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate

    Open Access•John G Bullock•American Political Science Review•2011

Citations per year7.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae