When Is Proportional Not Proportional? Great Britain’s 2009 Elections to the European Parliament
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7997909 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ian Mclean (0000-0001-5607-5966), Iain Mclean, Ron Johnston (0000-0003-3031-8573) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 349-355 |
| Publication date | 2009-10-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Representation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4893 • E-ISSN: 1749-4001 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00344890903235199 |
| OpenAlex | W2010089428 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 1 |
British elections to the European Parliament use a regional list system, selected to meet the European Union requirement that all countries use proportional representation to elect their MEPs. Within each of the British 11 regions, seats are allocated to parties using the d’Hondt (or Jefferson) system rather than the Sainte‐Laguë (or Webster), although the latter produces more proportional outcomes because the former is biased against smaller parties. Analysis of the 2009 European election in Great Britain shows that if Sainte‐Laguë had been used rather than d’Hondt six of the 69 seats would have been differently allocated. The main beneficiary would have been the Green Party, with seven MEPs rather than two
Beneficiary · Democracy · Economic history · Economic policy · Economics · Electoral system · European union · General election · Lower house · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Proportional representation · Representation (politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · History · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,21 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2019 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |