Upstream and downstream implementation arrangements in two‐level games. A focus on administrative simplification in the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7998380 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fabrizio Di Mascio (0000-0001-6165-6335, University of Turin), Alessandro Natalini (0000-0002-6455-3953, Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta), Stefania Profeti (0000-0002-9418-2743, University of Bologna, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 212-233 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ropr.12594 |
| OpenAlex | W4390541635 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 36 |
The onset of the European NGEU program represented for European member states a formidable opportunity for post‐pandemic recovery and yet a significant challenge at the same time: to receive and retain EU funds, each state had to promptly draw up a National Recovery and Resilience Plan—NRRP) and commit to a pressing timetable for its implementation. Regarding this challenge, the Italian government's response is a case in point: first, Italy is by far the largest beneficiary of NGEU funds; second, it has long had a reputation for being laggard in both the implementation of European directives and the spending of cohesion policy structural funds; and the formulation of the NRRP, the design of the governance in charge of its implementation, and implementation itself, occurred at a particular moment in the country's political life. Based on these premises, the article examines the upstream process by which the Italian government designed the implementation arrangements for the adoption of simplification policies under the NRRP and their downstream recalibration in the first two years, taking the implementation arrangements as the dependent variable. Analytically, the focus is on the interplay between the pressures of EU timetables and internal political dynamics, be they the legacy or strategic political considerations on the part of national policymakers, in determining the design and eventual re‐design of implementation arrangements as the plan unfolds
Beneficiary · Business · Cohesion (chemistry · Corporate governance · Downstream (manufacturing · Economic policy · Economics · European integration · European union · Government (linguistics · Intergovernmentalism · Operations management · Political science · Politics · Resilience (materials science · Upstream (networking · Engineering · European Union Policy and Governance · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Finance
EU tourism funding
What Makes Member States opt for Hybrid Implementation Structures When the Federal Policy Asks for It
Practical implementation of artificial intelligence for climate change mitigation in cities – priorities, collaborations and challenges
Implementation arrangements and policy success in active social policies
Europeanisation in the aftermath of Covid-19
Negotiated and negotiable? Contractual governance and the flexibility of the EU’s recovery and resilience facility
Impact of regional investment on the sustainable development goals
The Bureaucracy versus Post‐Bureaucracy Paradox in Public Administration
Implementation arrangements as institutions
Administrative Traditions
Politics in Time
Critical junctures and institutional change
Challenges to State Policy Capacity
Governing the Pandemic
Decision‐making traps behind low regional absorption of Cohesion Policy funds
The Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan
The political leadership of Mario Draghi
Implementing the NRRP from the Draghi government to the government of Giorgia Meloni
How different multilevel and multi-actor arrangements impact policy implementation
The implementation of administrative burden reduction policy
Public Administration and Creeping Crises
From austerity‐conditionality towards a new investment‐led growth strategy
Can Administrative Capacity Explain Differences in Regional Performances? Evidence from Structural Funds Implementation in Southern Italy
Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy
Why there is no 'southern problem'. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union
The Influence of the European Semester
The EU Institutional Architecture in the Covid‐19 Response
Governing Europe's Recovery and Resilience Facility
How Italian regulatory policy encounters Europe
How Political Stability Shapes Administrative Performance
Evaluating the ‘Quasi Federalist’ Programme of Decentralisation in Italy since the 1990s
Process Sequencing Policy Dynamics
Political time in the EU
How politics matters for EU funds’ absorption problems – a fuzzy-set analysis
How does the EU tick? Five propositions on political time
Moving beyond legal compliance
Diplomacy and domestic politics
The polity of implementation
Euroscepticism and Populism in Italy Among Party Elites and the Public
Path dependence in historical sociology
Reversals of fortune
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |