Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing Progress Towards SDGs Implementation Using Multiple Reference Point Based Multicriteria Methods

The Case Study of the European Countries

Bibliographic Data

ID8017403
AuthorsElena Ricciolini (0000-0001-7473-4283, University of Perugia), L Rocchi (0000-0002-3386-2390, University of Perugia), M Cardinali (0000-0002-2923-130X, University of Perugia), Luisa Paolotti (0000-0002-8264-1674, University of Perugia), Francisco Ruiz (0000-0002-2651-9033, Universidad de Málaga), José Manuel Cabello (0000-0002-6748-018X, Universidad de Málaga), A Boggia (0000-0002-7049-4144, University of Perugia)
Year2022
Volume162
Issue3
Pages1233-1260
Publication date2022-01-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Indicators Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0303-8300 • E-ISSN: 1573-0921
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s11205-022-02886-w
PMID35125614
OpenAlexW4210814648
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited25

To achieve the UN 2030 Agenda Goals, and considering their complexity and multidisciplinary, Multi-criteria analysis appears to be a suitable approach to give a true support to public decision makers in defining policy lines. This study focuses on the application of the Multiple Reference Point Weak-Strong Composite Indicators (MRP-WSCI) and its partially compensatory version (MRP-PCI), to assess, in the framework of the UN 2030 Agenda, the sustainability of the 28 members of the European Union (pre-Brexit). Countries were analyzed and compared according to their conditions and progress against the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, considering three reference years: 2007, 2012 and 2017. The analysis shows that Nordic countries reach a good level of global sustainability, with values of the indicators, W-W-W and S-W-W, between 2 and 3; while the States of east Europe, in particular Romania, Bulgaria and Greece, stay at the worst levels, having overall indicators values less than 1.5. Furthermore, the results highlight how countries in the lower group have difficulties especially in social and economic sustainability. On the other hand, states with a good overall condition record the worst results in the environmental dimension, such as the Netherlands, which shows, for the year 2017, a value for this sphere less than 2, while in the other two show a good value (over 2.5)

Brexit · Economic policy · Economics · European union · Multidisciplinary approach · Political science · Public economics · Statistics · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Value (mathematics · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Mathematics · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy

  • Evaluating Sustainable Development Performance in Indian States

    Open Access•Anil Gurjar, Anupam Ghosh•Public Administration and…•2025

  • Uncovering socioeconomic disparities in European regions

    Open Access•Mariaelena Bottazzi Schenone, Venera Tomaselli et al.•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • Methodology for assessing progress in sustainable development goals indicators in urban water systems. How far are we from the 2030 targets

    Open Access•Camila García, P Amparo López-Jiménez et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Development and implementation of learning efficiency evaluation model

    Open Access•Zhifei Li, Shuaixing Xu et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2026

  • Sustainability and resilience of rural livelihoods

    Sanjib Biswa, Aparajita Sanyal et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • A comparison of economic, environmental and social performance of European countries

    Open Access•Denise Anselmi, Idiano D’adamo et al.•Environment Development and…•2023

  • Sustainable development according to 2030 agenda in European Union countries

    Open Access•Elena Ricciolini, Arianna Tiralti et al.•Sustainable Development•2023

  • Performance Towards Sustainability

    Open Access•Victor Tomaz de Oliveira, Denilson Teixeira et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Equitable and sustainable well‐being indicators

    Open Access•Idiano D’adamo, Cristina Di Carlo et al.•Sustainable Development•2024

  • One Step Away from 2030

    Open Access•M Glòria Barberà-Mariné, Maria-Glòria Barberà-Mariné et al.•European Journal of Development…•2024

  • Measuring and Monitoring Provincial Sustainable Development Goals in China

    Open Access•Hongshuai Wang, Yongheng Yang•Social Indicators Research•2024

  • Unexpected Ally

    Open Access•Ali Khan, Ali Nawaz Khan•Social Indicators Research•2024

  • Environmental sustainability and Beautiful China

    Open Access•Yang Guan, Qiang Ye et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2024

  • Assessing progress toward sustainable development goals at the subnational level

    Open Access•L Rocchi, Lina Lauraitienė et al.•Journal of Baltic Studies•2026

  • A decision support approach for sustainability management using multiple criteria decision making and statistical techniques

    Open Access•Ana Belén Mirete Ruíz, Sandra González-Gallardo et al.•Sustainable Futures•2025

  • National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards

    Open Access•Guido Schmidt‐Traub, Christian Kroll et al.•Nature Geoscience•2017

  • Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Tomáš Hák, Svatava Janoušková et al.•Ecological Indicators•2016

  • A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals

    Open Access•Rodrigo Goyannes Gusm Ão Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2018

  • A policy scenario analysis of sustainable agricultural development options

    Elly Lancker, Peter Nijkamp•Impact Assessment and Project…•2000

  • Assessing environmental sustainability by the double reference point methodology

    José Manuel Cabello, Enrique Navarro Jurado et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Frontrunners and laggards

    Open Access•Markus Hametner, Mariia Kostetckaia•Ecological Economics•2020

  • Prioritising SDG targets

    Open Access•Cameron Allen, Graciela Metternicht et al.•Sustainability Science•2018

  • Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    Open Access•Cameron Allen, Michael Reid et al.•Sustainability Science•2019

  • The transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    Open Access•Casey Stevens, Norichika Kanie•International Environmental…•2016

  • Measuring sustainable development goals performance

    Open Access•Apollonia Miola, Miola Apollonia et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Classifying Sustainable Development Goal trajectories

    Open Access•John W McArthur, Krista Rasmussen•World Development•2019

  • Assessment of sustainability using a synthetic index

    Open Access•Lillian Marti, Luisa Marti et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2020

Unique citing works15
Citations per year5
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae