Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Audience, Mass, Crowd

Theatres of Cruelty in Interwar Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID8038071
AuthorsKimberly Jannarone (corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume61
Issue2
Pages191-211
Publication date2009-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheatre Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-2882 • E-ISSN: 1086-332X
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/tj.0.0160
OpenAlexW1979804757
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited14

This essay interprets the Theatre of Cruelty's ideal spectator in light of early twentieth-century theatre audiences and the field of crowd theory. Artaud was writing at a moment when the role and identity of the audience was being radically redefined. The late nineteenth century transformed the audience from an active assembly to a refined, domesticated, and physically restrained group of people who obeyed the command to contemplate in stillness what transpired behind the proscenium. While much of the avant-garde rebelled against this new bourgeois audience and developed strategies to attempt to reinvigorate the spectator, many other performance theorists built on this new means of control. During the 1920s and 1930s, some theatres sought to intensify the audience's emotional experience while keeping it physically restrained, orchestrating an ecstatic loss of self. This essay suggests that, contrary to all our familiar associations with Artaud's work, Artaud's contemporary doubles were the creators of peoples' theatres in interwar Italy and Germany; while the avant-garde was still thinking in terms of "audience," these theatres were thinking of "crowds

Aesthetics · Art · Bourgeoisie · Criminology · Cruelty · Journalism · Literature · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Visual arts · Cinema and Media Studies · History · Law · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism · Theatre and Performance Studies

  • Fascism, Reality, Shit, and the German Stage

    Open Access•Andrew L Friedman, Andrew Friedman•TDR/The Drama Review•2023

  • Performative Mo(nu)ments

    Open Access•Eleftheria Ioannidou•Fascism•2023

  • The age of the crowd

    Serge Moscovici•The age of the crowd•1985

  • Group psychology and the analysis of the ego.

    Sigmund Freud, James Strachey•1922

  • The Deconstructed Self in Artaud and Brecht

    Rainer Friedrich•Forum for Modern Language Studies•1990

  • Writing and Difference

    Jacques Derrida, Alan Bass•Writing and Difference•2001

  • The Nationalization of the Masses

    George L Mosse, Victoria De Grazia•Nationalization of the Masses•2023

  • The crowd

    Gustave Le Bon•1908

  • Theatre under the Nazis

    Jorg Bochow, John London•German Studies Review•2002

  • Forgetting Lot's Wife

    Martin Harries•Yale journal of criticism/ The…•1998

  • Antonin Artaud and the Modern Theater

    Open Access•Felicia Mccarren, Gene A Plunka•South Central Review•1996

  • The Theatre before Its Double

    Open Access•Kimberly Jannarone•Theatre Survey•2005

  • The Dramatic Concepts of Antonin Artaud

    Herbert S Gershman, Eric Sellin•Books Abroad•1968

  • Theatre, Sacrifice, Ritual

    Erika Fischer-Lichte•Theatre, Sacrifice, Ritual•2007

  • Artaud, Germ Theory, and the Theatre of Contagion

    Stanton B Garner•Theatre Journal•2006

  • People's Theatre

    Alan Andrews, David Bradby et al.•Labour / Le Travail•1982

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae