Getting a Seat at the Table
Capital, Capture and Expert Groups in the European Union
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8041545 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam William Chalmers (0000-0001-5192-8309, Leiden University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 976-992 |
| Publication date | 2013-11-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | West European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402382.2013.852832 |
| OpenAlex | W2129217815 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
| References cited | 25 |
European Commission expert groups provide powerful platforms from which interest organisations can steer the EU consultation process and weigh in on policy outcomes. Commission decision-makers and bureaucrats rely heavily on expert groups to provide expert policy advice on highly technical issues in the early stages of the policymaking process. Interest organisations provide this advice in order to have their voices heard at the EU level. But whose interests are being represented in these expert groups? Which types of interest organisations, in other words, get a seat at the table and why? This article, using data on over 800 expert groups and nearly 3,000 interest organisations, argues that expert group membership is largely a function of superior resources, EU-level interests and existing institutionalised ties to decision-makers. Far from simply addressing the Commission's need for expertise, expert group membership is more a story of capital and capture. Notes1. As stated in a 2002 Communication, the European Commission 'maintains a high level of in-house expertise, but also frequently calls on external experts' (European Commission Citation2002: 3).2. For a competing view (see Klüver 2011).3. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/4. The EU Transparency Register was downloaded on 16 November 2012 from http://europa.eu/transparency-register/index_en.htm5. A recent conference paper presented by Rasmussen and Gross (Citation2012) takes up this question, comparing those interest organisations that are represented in expert groups with the larger population of interest organisations in the EU's Transparency Register
Business · Capital (architecture · Commission · European union · International trade · Order (exchange · Political science · Public relations · Transparency (behavior · Accounting · European Union Policy and Governance · Finance · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Time well spent? A population study of corporate access to the executive in the United Kingdom
Transparency as an empty signifier? Assessing transparency in EU and platform initiatives on online political advertising and actors
Private Power, the Rule of Law and the European Union
Source over Quantity? The Effect of Civil Society Funding on Access to the EU Commission
Between science, economics and politics
Informational lobbying in a Polish-German comparative perspective
Societal Inclusion in Expert Venues
The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups
A Game of Whac-A-Mole
Interest group representation on government committees in Kenya
From rhetoric to regulation
Analyser la participation des entreprises de sécurité et de défense dans la politique européenne de gestion des frontières par le prisme du travail politique
Getting Cozy, or How the European Commission Produces Legitimacy in the EU
Policy networks for European internal security governance
Lobbying global venues
Interest group resources, access, and influence
Interactions between Interest Groups and Political Parties in the Czech Republic and Slovakia - Three Decades after the Velvet Divorce
Non‐State Actors and the New Intergovernmentalism
New venue for new policy and actors? Tracing participation and debate on digital copyright and emerging technologies in Wipo and WTO
Explaining Participation Bias in the European Commission's Online Consultations
Interest groups and strategic constructivism
Explaining interest group access to the European Commission’s expert groups
In over their heads
Solving AI ethics? Hybrid expertise and professional power in EU ethics governance
Biased access? Exploring selection to advisory committees
Lobbying and Policy Change
Interest Representation in the European Union
The Political Economy of Expertise
Information, Lobbying and the Legislative Process in the European Union
The Institutional Shaping of EU–Society Relations
The Commission’s Advisory Groups and Committees in the Field of Agricultural Policy
Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU
Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European union
Researching Interest Group Politics in Europe and Elsewhere
The European Business Interest and the Nation State
The political functions of expert knowledge
The public policy of the European Union
Corporate lobbying in the European Union
Trading information for access
Insider and Outsider Lobbying of the European Commission
The contextual nature of lobbying
Exchanging access goods for access
Determinants of Upper-Class Dominance in the Heavenly Chorus
Policy framing
Access of Experts
The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems
Interest Groups and the Revitalisation of Democracy
Measuring the size and scope of the EU interest group population
| Unique citing works | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,08 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 25 |