Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public trust in the European legal systems

Independence, Accountability and Awareness

Bibliographic Data

ID8041823
AuthorsNuno Garoupa (0000-0001-6792-0918, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, Arlington, Virginia, USA), Pedro C Magalhães (0000-0001-8934-4552, University of Lisbon, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume44
Issue3
Pages690-713
Publication date2020-02-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWest European Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01402382.2020.1715605
OpenAlexW3005651317
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited51

Two findings stand out in the literature on public attitudes vis-à-vis courts. The first is that judicial independence increases public trust. The second is that ‘to know courts is to love them’. In this study, these stylised facts are used as a starting point to ask three questions. First, is there also a role for judicial accountability in fostering public trust, above and beyond that played by independence? Second, could it be that only the most aware citizens are sensitive to such properties of the judicial system? Third, is the notion that ‘to know courts is to love them’ limited to systems with high levels of judicial independence and accountability? Using recently available macro-level indicators of judicial independence and accountability and the high-quality survey data collected by the European Social Survey in 32 countries throughout more than a decade, this study provides evidence that the answers to these questions are positive

Accountability · Business · Economics · Independence (probability theory · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal principles and applications · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Public Administration

  • Do the Audio and Video from Public Hearings Impact High Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Andrew Stones, Jeffrey Ziegler•Journal of Experimental Political…•2026

  • Post-truth and post-trust

    Open Access•Judit Bayer•ERA•2024

  • Measuring the prestige of administrative courts

    Open Access•Monika Stachowiak‐Kudła, Joanne Kudla•Quality & Quantity•2023

  • Awareness of Executive Interference and the Demand for Judicial Independence

    Open Access•Martín Gandur, Taylor Kinsley Chewning et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Framing the Judiciary

    Open Access•Alisher Juzgenbayev•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Effective Judicial Communication and Trust in the Judiciary

    Open Access•Yu‐Hsien Sung•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Trusting the Gatekeeper

    Open Access•Dana Natan‐Krup, Shlomo Mizrahi et al.•Regulation & Governance•2026

  • A Bottom-Up Analysis of Societal Belief in Judicial Independence in Russia

    Kathryn Hendley•Communist and Post-Communist…•2023

  • Judicial Performance and Trust in Legal Systems

    Open Access•Pedro C Magalhães, Nuno Garoupa•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • How the rule of law shapes trust? The role of the transplant effect and legal families

    Güler Sağlam, Halit Yanıkkaya•Acta Oeconomica•2025

  • Out‐party, out of luck

    Open Access•Pedro C Magalhães, Luís De Sousa et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Populist governments, judicial independence, and public trust in the courts

    Pedro C Magalhães, Nuno Garoupa•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • Citizens’ trust in constitutional courts

    Open Access•Pablo José Castillo Ortiz, Pablo Castillo-Ortiz et al.•European Political Science Review•2025

  • The legitimacy‐conferring capacity of constitutional courts

    Open Access•Sebastian Sternberg, Sylvain Brouard et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • Trust in the Judiciary and Partisan Reactions to Judicial Checks

    Open Access•Martín Gandur•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Courts and Social Participation in Latin America

    Open Access•Cordula Tibi Weber, Mariana Llanos et al.•Law & Policy•2026

  • Between impartiality and politicization

    Open Access•Eileen Böhringer, Christophe Boucher•Electoral Studies•2024

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

    Open Access•A Lind, E Allan Lind et al.•Social Psychology of Procedural…•1988

  • The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Journal of Empirical Legal Studies•2007

  • An Evaluation of Cross-National Measures of Judicial Independence

    Julio Ríos-Figueroa, Jeffrey K Staton•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2014

  • The V-Dem Measurement Model

    Open Access•Daniel Pemstein, Kyle L Marquardt et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2018

  • Title unavailable

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Changing Attitudes to Punishment

    Julian Roberts, Mike Hough•Changing Attitudes to Punishment•2013

  • A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012

    Open Access•Drew A Linzer, Jeffrey K Staton•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Judicial Independence as an Organizing Principle

    Open Access•Charles Gardner Geyh•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • Sentencing Trends in Britain

    Open Access•Mike Hough, Julian V Roberts•Punishment & Society•1999

  • Why Doesn't the Bulgarian Judiciary Prosecute Corruption

    Maria Popova•Problems of Post-Communism•2012

  • Public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Donald P Haider-Markel•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • Lay Knowledge of Courts in Canada

    Open Access•Peter Bowal, IRENE WANKE•International Journal of the…•2001

  • Trust in the System? Factors that Impact Citizens’ View of Courts in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Michael A Hansen•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Institutional Trust, Education, and Corruption

    Armen Hakhverdian, Quinton Mayne•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Judicial Independence in Europe

    Carlo Guarnieri•Representation•2013

  • Political Trust as the Evaluation of Process and Performance

    Open Access•Tom Van Der Meer, T W G Tom Van Der Meer et al.•Political Studies•2017

  • Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction

    Open Access•Jan P Heisig, Merlin Schaeffer•European Sociological Review•2019

  • Confidence in the Judiciary

    Marc Bühlmann, Ruth Kunz•West European Politics•2011

  • Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts

    Sara C Benesh•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction

    William D Berry, Matt Golder et al.•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Social Trust and Attitudes Toward Democracy

    Sonja Zmerli, Zmerli et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • The Curse of Knowledge? Education, Corruption, and Politics

    Open Access•Mattias Agerberg•Political Behavior•2019

  • The Asian Values Thesis Revisited

    Open Access•Christian Welzel•Japanese Journal of Political…•2011

  • Organizing consent

    Open Access•Marcia Grimes•European Journal of Political…•2006

  • Public confidence in the judiciary

    Aylin Aydin-Cakir, Aylin Aydın Çakır et al.•Democratization•2016

  • Testing the Effects of Independent Judiciaries on the Likelihood of Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Douglas M Gibler, Kirk A Randazzo•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • The Sources Of Public Confidence In State Courts

    Open Access•James P Wenzel, Shaun Bowler et al.•American Politics Research•2003

  • The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins

    Rafael La Porta, Florencio López‐de‐silane et al.•Journal of Economic Literature•2008

  • Losing, but Accepting

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Milton Lodge et al.•Law & Society Review•2014

  • On the Legitimacy of National High Courts

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Judging the Judiciary

    Open Access•Ryan Salzman, Adam Ramsey•Latin American Politics and Society•2013

  • Giving Up on the Joneses? The Relationship between Income Inequality and Status-seeking

    Marii Paskov, Klarita Gërxhani et al.•European Sociological Review•2017

Unique citing works17
Citations per year2,83
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae