Judicial policy‐making and the evolving rotection of human rights
The European court of human rights in comparative perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8042019 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John F Stack (0000-0002-0810-6059, Florida International University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 137-155 |
| Publication date | 1992-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | West European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402389208424926 |
| OpenAlex | W2048878933 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
This contribution is a comparative analysis of three attempts to strengthen the supranational protection of human rights in an increasingly transnational world. It focuses on the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations, the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter‐American Court of Human Rights. The recent decision by the Inter‐American Court on the forced disappearance of individuals by state or para‐state forces illustrates the important role of cross‐pollenisation from the European Court and the United Nations. It further demonstrates how judges on supranational courts attempt to make law in the face of uncertain government compliance
Fundamental rights · Government (linguistics · Human rights · International human rights law · Perspective (graphical · Political science · State (computer science · European and International Law Studies · Human Rights and Development · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,06 |
| Citation span | 1994 - 2011 (18) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |