Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ghost-in-the-Machine reveals human social signals for human–robot interaction

Bibliographic Data

ID8069614
AuthorsSebastian Loth (0000-0002-3580-8099, corresponding author), Katharina Jettka, Manuel Giuliani (0000-0003-3781-7623), Jan P De Ruiter (0000-0003-2897-8804)
Year2015
Volume6
Pages1641-1641
Publication date2015-11-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1664-1078 • E-ISSN: 1664-1078
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01641
PMID26582998
OpenAlexW2155751166
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited64

We used a new method called "Ghost-in-the-Machine" (GiM) to investigate social interactions with a robotic bartender taking orders for drinks and serving them. Using the GiM paradigm allowed us to identify how human participants recognize the intentions of customers on the basis of the output of the robotic recognizers. Specifically, we measured which recognizer modalities (e.g., speech, the distance to the bar) were relevant at different stages of the interaction. This provided insights into human social behavior necessary for the development of socially competent robots. When initiating the drink-order interaction, the most important recognizers were those based on computer vision. When drink orders were being placed, however, the most important information source was the speech recognition. Interestingly, the participants used only a subset of the available information, focussing only on a few relevant recognizers while ignoring others. This reduced the risk of acting on erroneous sensor data and enabled them to complete service interactions more swiftly than a robot using all available sensor data. We also investigated socially appropriate response strategies. In their responses, the participants preferred to use the same modality as the customer's requests, e.g., they tended to respond verbally to verbal requests. Also, they added redundancy to their responses, for instance by using echo questions. We argue that incorporating the social strategies discovered with the GiM paradigm in multimodal grammars of human-robot interactions improves the robustness and the ease-of-use of these interactions, and therefore provides a smoother user experience

Autism · Cognitive psychology · Human–computer interaction · Human–robot interaction · Joint attention · Mobile robot · Modalities · Redundancy (engineering · Robot · Robot control · Robustness (evolution · Social cue · Social relation · Social robot · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Speech and dialogue systems · Artificial Intelligence · Social Psychology

  • Guiding a Person Through Combined Robotic and Projection Movements

    Open Access•Aki Tamai, Soya Ono et al.•International Journal of Social…•2022

  • Automatically Classifying User Engagement for Dynamic Multi-party Human–Robot Interaction

    Open Access•Mary Ellen Foster, Andre Gaschler et al.•International Journal of Social…•2017

  • Rocking together

    Open Access•Michael J Richardson, Kerry L Marsh et al.•Human Movement Science•2007

  • Explorations in engagement for humans and robots

    Open Access•Candace L Sidner, Christopher Lee et al.•Artificial Intelligence•2005

  • Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI

    Laurel Riek•Journal of Human-Robot Interaction•2012

  • Gorillas in our midst

    Daniel J Simons, Christopher F Chabris•Perception•1999

  • Human–Robot Interaction

    Michael A Goodrich, Alan C Schultz•Foundations and Trends® in…•2008

  • Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis

    Open Access•Jeffrey N Rouder, Paul L Speckman et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2009

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology

    Paul S Adler, Paul Adler et al.•Oxford Handbook of Sociology,…•2014

  • Inattentional Blindness

    Arien Mack, Irvin Rock•Inattentional blindness•1998

  • Eye-Contact, Distance and Affiliation

    Michael Argyle, Janet Dean et al.•Sociometry•1965

  • Meaning

    H P Grice•The Philosophical Review•1957

  • Psychological status of the script concept

    Robert P Abelson•American Psychologist•1981

  • Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding

    Roger C Schank•Scripts, plans, goals, and…•1977

  • Opening up Closings

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff, Harvey Sacks•Semiotica•1973

  • Action and embodiment within situated human interaction

    Open Access•Charles Goodwin•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation

    Emanuel A Schegloff, Gail Jefferson et al.•Language•1977

  • Speech differences between women and men on the wrong track

    Open Access•Dede Brouwer, Marinel Gerritsen et al.•Language in Society•1979

  • Sequencing in Conversational Openings1

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•American Anthropologist•1968

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,22
Citation span2017 - 2022 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae