Ghost-in-the-Machine reveals human social signals for human–robot interaction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8069614 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sebastian Loth (0000-0002-3580-8099, corresponding author), Katharina Jettka, Manuel Giuliani (0000-0003-3781-7623), Jan P De Ruiter (0000-0003-2897-8804) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 1641-1641 |
| Publication date | 2015-11-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1664-1078 • E-ISSN: 1664-1078 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01641 |
| PMID | 26582998 |
| OpenAlex | W2155751166 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 64 |
We used a new method called "Ghost-in-the-Machine" (GiM) to investigate social interactions with a robotic bartender taking orders for drinks and serving them. Using the GiM paradigm allowed us to identify how human participants recognize the intentions of customers on the basis of the output of the robotic recognizers. Specifically, we measured which recognizer modalities (e.g., speech, the distance to the bar) were relevant at different stages of the interaction. This provided insights into human social behavior necessary for the development of socially competent robots. When initiating the drink-order interaction, the most important recognizers were those based on computer vision. When drink orders were being placed, however, the most important information source was the speech recognition. Interestingly, the participants used only a subset of the available information, focussing only on a few relevant recognizers while ignoring others. This reduced the risk of acting on erroneous sensor data and enabled them to complete service interactions more swiftly than a robot using all available sensor data. We also investigated socially appropriate response strategies. In their responses, the participants preferred to use the same modality as the customer's requests, e.g., they tended to respond verbally to verbal requests. Also, they added redundancy to their responses, for instance by using echo questions. We argue that incorporating the social strategies discovered with the GiM paradigm in multimodal grammars of human-robot interactions improves the robustness and the ease-of-use of these interactions, and therefore provides a smoother user experience
Autism · Cognitive psychology · Human–computer interaction · Human–robot interaction · Joint attention · Mobile robot · Modalities · Redundancy (engineering · Robot · Robot control · Robustness (evolution · Social cue · Social relation · Social robot · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Speech and dialogue systems · Artificial Intelligence · Social Psychology
Rocking together
Explorations in engagement for humans and robots
Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI
Gorillas in our midst
Human–Robot Interaction
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
G*Power 3
Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology
Inattentional Blindness
Eye-Contact, Distance and Affiliation
Meaning
Psychological status of the script concept
Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding
Opening up Closings
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Speech differences between women and men on the wrong track
Sequencing in Conversational Openings1
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |