Kant’s Deduction From Apperception

In focusing on the systematic deduction of the categories from a principle, Schulting takes up anew the controversial project of the eminent German Kant scholar Klaus Reich, whose monograph "The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments" made the case that the logical functions of judgement can all be derived from the objective unity of apperception and can be shown to link up with one another systematically. Common opinion among Kantians today has it that Kant did not mean to derive the functions of judgement, and accordingly the categories, from the principle of apperception. Schulting challenges this standard view and aims to resuscitate the main motivation behind Reich's project. He argues, in agreement with Reich's main thesis about the derivability of the functions of judgement, that Kant indeed does mean to derive, in full a priori fashion, the categories from the principle of apperception. Schulting also shows that, given the general assumptions of the Critical philosophy, Kant's derivation is successful and that absent an account of the derivation of the categories from apperception, the B-Deduction cannot really be understood. New edition. First published 2012 as "Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories" (Palgrave Macmillan

A priori and a posteriori · Apperception · Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Judgement · Linguistics · Psychoanalysis · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology

• The Human A Priori

  A W Moore•Human a Priori•2023

  Incluir item

• Kant-Bibliographie 2018

  Margit Ruffing•Kant-Studien•2020

  Incluir item

• Kant-Bibliographie 2019

  Margit Ruffing•Kant-Studien•2021

  Incluir item

• Lectures on Logic

  Open Access•Immanuel Kant, J Michael Young•Lectures on Logic•1992

  Incluir item

• Lectures on Metaphysics

  Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Karl Ameriks et al.•Lectures on Metaphysics•1997

  Incluir item

• The transcendental deduction of the categories

  Open Access•Paul Guyer•The Cambridge Companion to Kant•1992

  Incluir item

• Kant's Construction of Nature

  Open Access•Michael Friedman•Kant's Construction of Nature•2013

  Incluir item

• Assessing Kant's Master Argument

  Open Access•Derk Pereboom•Kantian Review•2001

  Incluir item

• Kant and the Capacity to Judge

  Kenneth R Westphal, Béatrice Longuenesse et al.•The Philosophical Review•2000

  Incluir item

• Kantis Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction

  Ian Proops•Journal of the history of…•2003

  Incluir item

• Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument

  Karl Ameriks•Kant-Studien•1978

  Incluir item

• Wollte Kant Die Vollständigkeit Seiner Urteilstafel Beweisen

  L Krüger•Kant-Studien•1968

  Incluir item

• Idealism and freedom

  Henry E Allison•Idealism and Freedom•1996

  Incluir item