Affective and Engagement Issues in the Conception and Assessment of a Robot-Assisted Psychomotor Therapy for Persons with Dementia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8077345 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Natacha Rouaix, Laure Retru-Chavastel, Anne‐Sophie Rigaud (0000-0002-6827-4417), Anne-Sophie Rigaud, Clotilde Monnet, Hermine Lenoir, Maribel Pino (0000-0002-1598-9144, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Pages | 950-950 |
| Publication date | 2017-06-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1664-1078 • E-ISSN: 1664-1078 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00950 |
| PMID | 28713296 |
| OpenAlex | W2724805274 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 30 |
The interest in robot-assisted therapies (RAT) for dementia care has grown steadily in recent years. However, RAT using humanoid robots is still a novel practice for which the adhesion mechanisms, indications and benefits remain unclear. Also, little is known about how the robot's behavioral and affective style might promote engagement of persons with dementia (PwD) in RAT. The present study sought to investigate the use of a humanoid robot in a psychomotor therapy for PwD. We examined the robot's potential to engage participants in the intervention and its effect on their emotional state. A brief psychomotor therapy program involving the robot as the therapist's assistant was created. For this purpose, a corpus of social and physical behaviors for the robot and a "control software" for customizing the program and operating the robot were also designed. Particular attention was given to components of the RAT that could promote participant's engagement (robot's interaction style, personalization of contents). In the pilot assessment of the intervention nine PwD (7 women and 2 men, M age = 86 y/o) hospitalized in a geriatrics unit participated in four individual therapy sessions: one classic therapy (CT) session (patient- therapist) and three RAT sessions (patient-therapist-robot). Outcome criteria for the evaluation of the intervention included: participant's engagement, emotional state and well-being; satisfaction of the intervention, appreciation of the robot, and empathy-related behaviors in human-robot interaction (HRI). Results showed a high constructive engagement in both CT and RAT sessions. More positive emotional responses in participants were observed in RAT compared to CT. RAT sessions were better appreciated than CT sessions. The use of a social robot as a mediating tool appeared to promote the involvement of PwD in the therapeutic intervention increasing their immediate wellbeing and satisfaction
Cognition · Dementia · Empathy · Intervention (counseling · Psychiatry · Psychomotor learning · Psychotherapist · Robot · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research · Computer Science · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Medicine · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Applied Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Clinical Psychology · Occupational Therapy · Social Psychology
Social Robots for People Living with Dementia
Designing User Interfaces of Assistive Technology for People Living With Dementia
Interaction Assessment of a Social-Care Robot in Day center Patients with Mild to Moderate Cognitive Impairment
A Deep Dive into Human-Robot Interaction in Hospitals
Development of a decision‐support framework to support professionals and promote comfort among older hospital inpatients living with dementia
A Robot-Mediated Activity Using the Nao Robot to Promote Covid-19 Precautionary Measures among Older Adults in Geriatric Facilities
Social Robots for the Care of Persons with Dementia
The Perceptions of People with Dementia and Key Stakeholders Regarding the Use and Impact of the Social Robot Mario
Living With Seal Robots—Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House
Assistive social robots in elderly care
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Socially assistive robotics [Grand Challenges of Robotics]
“Mini-mental state”
Testing Empathy with Robots
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |