Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Practical judgment as reflective judgment

On moral salience and Kantian particularist universalism

Bibliographic Data

ID8078667
AuthorsSabina Vaccarino Bremner (0000-0002-1439-2362, Department of Philosophy University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume31
Issue3
Pages600-621
Publication date2022-07-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0966-8373 • E-ISSN: 1468-0378
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ejop.12811
OpenAlexW4285802960
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited39

Moral particularists and generalists alike have struggled over how to incorporate the role of moral salience in ethical reasoning. In this paper, I point to neglected resources in Kant to account for the role of moral salience in maxim formation: Kant's theory of reflective judgment. Kant tasks reflective judgment with picking out salient empirical particulars for formation into maxims, associating it with purposiveness, or intentional activity (action on ends ). The unexpected resources in Kantian reflective judgment suggest the possibility of a particularist universalism , where recalcitrant particulars directly inform, and in some cases revise, moral principles. Such an account improves on particularist accounts of moral salience and moral perception: rather than deriving moral sensitivity solely from an agent's upbringing or cultural resources, the reflective dimension is situated alongside the universalist dimension of moral principles typically identified with Kantian ethics, allowing for a critical approach both to moral universals and to the reception of moral particulars

Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Moral disengagement · Moral psychology · Moral reasoning · Political science · Problem of universals · Salience (neuroscience · Sociology · Universalism · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Law · Philosophy

  • Religious Autonomy and the Existential Process of Agency

    Open Access•Mohsen Shiravand•Millah Journal of Religious Studies•2026

  • Towards a “halfway plausible theory of ethics”

    Nicholas Dunn•British Journal for the History…•2026

  • What is a black radical Kantianism without Du Bois? On method, principle, and abolition democracy

    Open Access•Elvira Basevich•Journal of Social Philosophy•2024

  • Relativizing the A Priori By Way of Reflective Judgement

    Open Access•Sabina Vaccarino Bremner•Kantian Review•2023

  • Reflections of Reason

    Open Access•Nicholas Dunn•Kantian Review•2023

  • Algorithmic Governance and the Banality of Evil

    Hyungjoon Jun, Hyun Jung Lee•Public Integrity•2026

  • Making the Most of the Moral Uses of Imagination in Kant

    Open Access•Mavis L Bi•European Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • Kantian moral change

    Open Access•Sabina Vaccarino Bremner•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  • Seeing More

    Samantha Matherne•Seeing More•2024

  • Kant's Reason

    Kevin Schäfer, Karl Schafer•Kant's Reason•2023

  • From Principles to Practice

    Onora O’neill, Onora O'Neill•From Principles to Practice•2018

  • Intelligent Virtue

    Julia Annas•Intelligent virtue•2011

  • The Force of the Example

    Alessandro Ferrara•The force of the example•2008

  • Kant's Theory of Taste

    Open Access•Henry E Allison•Kant's Theory of Taste•2001

  • Kant's Theory of Freedom

    Open Access•Henry E Allison•Kant's Theory of Freedom•1990

  • Kant and the Experience of Freedom

    Open Access•Paul Guyer•Kant and the Experience of Freedom•1993

  • Kant on Beauty and Biology

    Open Access•Rachel Zuckert•Kant on Beauty and Biology•2007

  • The Moral Habitat

    Barbara Herman•Moral Habitat•2021

  • Kant's Ethical Thought

    Open Access•Allen W Wood•Kant's Ethical Thought•1999

  • Primitive Normativity and Skepticism about Rules

    Hannah Ginsborg, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2011

  • The Sources of Normativity

    Open Access•Christine M Korsgaard, Onora O’neill et al.•Sources of Normativity•1996

  • Kant on the Logical Form of Singular Judgements

    Open Access•Huaping Lu-Adler, Huaping Lu‐adler•Kantian Review•2014

  • On Conceptual Revision and Aesthetic Judgement

    Open Access•Sabina Vaccarino Bremner•Kantian Review•2021

  • Heautonomy

    Juliet Floyd•Kants Ästhetik / Kant's…•1998

  • A Democratic Theory of Judgment

    Linda M G Zerilli•A Democratic Theory of Judgment•2016

  • Modern Moral Philosophy

    Open Access•G E M Anscombe•Philosophy•1958

  • Right Reason in Plato and Aristotle

    Jessica Moss•Phronesis•2014

  • The Duty of Self‐Knowledge

    Open Access•Owen Ware•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2009

  • What's Aristotelian about neo‐Aristotelian Virtue Ethics

    Open Access•Sukaina Hirji•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2018

  • Ethics Without Principles

    Jonathan Dancy•Ethics without principles•2004

  • Self-Constitution

    Christine M Korsgaard•Self-constitution•2009

  • Reflective Judgment and the Problem of Assessing Virtue in Kant

    Open Access•Rudolf A Makkreel•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2002

  • Recent Work on Kantian Maxims I

    Open Access•Rob Gressis•Philosophy Compass•2010

Unique citing works10
Citations per year3,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae