Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Ethics of Inarticulacy

Bibliographic Data

ID8079542
AuthorsWill Kymlicka (0000-0001-6468-5174, corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume34
Issue2
Pages155-182
Publication date1991-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInquiry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00201749108602250
OpenAlexW2173149908
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited13

In his impressive and wide‐ranging new book, Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor argues that modern moral philosophy, at least within the Anglo‐American tradition, . offers a ‘cramped’ view of morality. Taylor attributes this problem to three distinctive features of contemporary moral theory ‐ its commitment to procedural rather than substantive rationality, its preference for basic reasons rather than qualitative distinctions, and its belief in the priority of the right over the good. According to Taylor, the result of these features is that contemporary moral theories cannot explain the nature of a worthwhile life, or the grounds for moral respect. Indeed, they render these questions unintelligible. I argue that Taylor has misunderstood the basic structure of most modern moral theory, which seeks to relocate, rather than suppress, these important questions. In particular, he fails to note the difference between general and specific conceptions of the good, between procedures for assessing the good and specific outcomes of that procedure, and between society's enforcement of morality and an individual's voluntary compliance with morality. Each of these distinctions plays an important role in contemporary moral theory. Once they are made explicit, it is clear that many contemporary theorists operate with a more sophisticated account of moral sources than Taylor attributes to them

Political science · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Philosophy

  • MacIntyre and The Ethics of Catastrophe

    Open Access•Sacha Golob•International Journal of…•2021

  • Mackie's moral theory

    D-P Baker•South African Journal of Philosophy•2001

  • Charles Taylor's transcendental arguments for liberal communitarianism

    Open Access•Yong Huang, Yong Huang Yong Huang•Philosophy & Social Criticism•1998

  • Ontologie, philosophie et politique

    Open Access•Geneviève Nootens•Dialogue•1996

  • Is Charles Taylor (Still) a Weak Ontologist

    Open Access•Michiel Meijer•Dialogue•2017

  • Habits of the heart

    Ann Swidler, Richard Madsen et al.•Habits of the heart•2007

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • Preference and Urgency

    T M Scanlon, Т М Scanlon•The Journal of Philosophy•1975

  • Comment on Narveson

    Open Access•Ronald Dworkin•Social Philosophy and Policy•1983

  • Contractualism and utilitarianism

    Open Access•T M Scanlon, Т М Scanlon•Utilitarianism and Beyond•1982

  • Reason and Feeling in Thinking about Justice

    Susan Moller Okin•Ethics•1989

  • Moral Luck

    Open Access•Bernard Williams•Moral Luck•1981

  • Well-being

    James Griffin•Well-being•1988

  • Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism

    David Lyons•Forms and limits of utilitarianism.•1965

  • Theories of Justice

    Brian Barry•Theories of Justice•1989

  • Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory

    John Rawls•The Journal of Philosophy•1980

Citations per year0.17
Citation span1996 - 2021 (26)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae