Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ryder’s Painism and His Criticism of Utilitarianism

Bibliographic Data

ID8083082
AuthorsJoost Leuven (corresponding author), Tatjana Višak (0000-0002-8371-4935, Utrecht University)
Year2012
Volume26
Issue2
Pages409-419
Publication date2012-02-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1187-7863 • E-ISSN: 1573-322X
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s10806-012-9381-3
OpenAlexW2036618364
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

As a member of the British Oxford Group, psychologist Richard Ryder marked the beginning of the modern animal rights and animal welfare movement in the seventies. By introducing the concept “speciesism.” Ryder contributed importantly to the expansion of this movement. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to Ryder’s moral theory, “painism”, that aims to resolve the conflict between the two predominant rival theories in animal ethics, the deontological of Tom Regan and the utilitarian of Peter Singer. First, this paper examines the kernel and historical sources of Ryder’s painist theory, linking it to the work of John Rawls and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Second, it examines Ryder’s critique of utilitarianism. It is argued that his critique of Singer’s use of the word “sentience” is unconvincing and that his critique of utilitarian aggregation as not taking a full account of the metaphysical separateness of persons, has already been countered and dealt with. Finally this paper looks at some of the counterintuitive implications of Ryder’s theory and argues that utilitarianism might have more resources for dealing with its own alleged counterintuitive implications than Ryder acknowledges

Animal ethics · Animal welfare · Counterintuitive · Criticism · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethical theory · Metaphysics · Normative ethics · Political science · Sentience · Sociology · Utilitarianism · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Corporeidad, prolepsis y dignidad. Un estudio no especista de la dignidad humana y el valor animal

    Open Access•José María Tejedor•Humanidades revista de la…•2023

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • The Philosophy of Animal Minds

    Open Access•Robert W Lurz•Philosophy of Animal Minds•2009

  • An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation

    Jeremy Bentham•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • The Case For Animal Rights

    Tom Regan, M W Fox•Advances in Animal Welfare…•1987

  • Why the Numbers Count

    Open Access•L W Sumner•Dialogue•1996

  • Animal Rights

    Hilda Kean•Animal Rights•1998

  • The pursuit of unhappiness

    Daniel M Haybron•The pursuit of unhappiness•2008

  • Rain without thunder

    Gary L Francione•Rain without thunder•1996

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae