Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political Ecologies of Meat

Bibliographic Data

ID8090154
AuthorsAnnalisa Colombino (0000-0001-6854-9903, corresponding author), Paolo Giaccaria (0000-0002-9050-053X)
EditorsJody Emel, Harvey Neo (0000-0002-4357-3808)
Year2015
Pages392
Publication date2015-05-15
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenuePolitical Ecologies of Meat (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4324/9781315818283
OpenAlexW2295427558
Open LibraryOL51666481M
ISBN9781315818283
LanguageEN
Citations received59
References cited12

In the spring of 2014, one of the authors (Paolo) was visiting the Green Market on Union Square, NYC, one of the most renowned farmers’ markets in the United States, performing a direct connection between producers and consumers of food, allegedly alternative to the mass retail channel (Tiemann, 2008), but also promoting what Sharon Zukin terms, from a critical standpoint, ‘the consumption of authenticity’ (2008). Exactly in the middle of the square, a farmer from Pennsylvania displayed a sign to attract customers claiming ‘Piedmontese Only’. Less than half a mile away, on Madison Square, at Eataly – the sumptuous sanctuary of ‘high-quality’ Italian food – the sophisticated New York consumer could already purchase a taste of Piedmontese beef at the butcher’s counter and at the Manzo restaurant (literally ‘beef’ in Italian) since the opening of the food mall, on 30 August 2010. The Piedmontese was officially recognized as a cattle breed in the 1850s. In 1996 it became the first presidium established by Slow Food in Bra, Piedmont.1 Its beef is now well renowned among gastronomists and listed in Michelin-starred restaurants (NAPA, 2010, p.6) and it is Eataly’s official beef in Italy and the US. But, what is, exactly, the link connecting these moments and places and which establishes a relationship between an apparently endangered cattle breed in the motherland of Slow Food and the sophisticated consumption practices of the world elites in New York City? La Granda, in its twofold role as a sociocultural and economic actor, provides the most obvious nexus, which articulates the connection between the past and present of the Piedmontese breed and the refined New York City cosmopolitan consumer. La Granda is the name of the Slow Food presidium of the Piedmontese breed founded by veterinarian Sergio Capaldo in 1996 to summon a small number of breeders and preserve the rearing of this apparently endangered cattle breed. La \n \nGranda Trasformazione is the meat-processing company, owned by Capaldo and Eataly’s founder Oscar Farinetti, established in 2004 to supply the Italian branches of the food mall with premium Piedmontese beef directly from the Slow Food presidium (Colombino and Giaccaria, 2013a).2 La Granda, rather obviously, does not directly supply the beef for Eataly New York. The beef sold at the butcher counter and used to cook at Manzo’s is more simply called ‘Piedmontese’ and is supplied by North American companies. The breed has in fact been reared in the US since 1979.3 However, La Granda and its founder play a key role in maintaining the consortium’s original quality conventions (Boltanski and Thevenot, 2006) – fixed and codified by the disciplinare di produzione (specifications of production), the document that establishes how exactly the cattle must be farmed, including strict rules on fodder and hygiene – by organizing workshops and training for Eataly’s butchers. Importantly, as we claim in this chapter, La Granda is only the final outcome of a contested process, originated in the second half of the nineteenthcentury, which has radically modified the political ecology of the Piedmontese breed. In this chapter, we ‘follow’ (Cook et al., 2006) the Piedmontese starting with a peculiar event that took place in 1886 in Guarene d’Alba, a small locality in the province of Cuneo (in Piedmont, Northern Italy) and ending on the butcher’s counter at Eataly, in contemporary New York City. In discussing some of the spatio-temporal trajectories of the Piedmontese, we bring to light the process that undergirds the transformation of a specific morphological feature – known today as the ‘double muscle factor’, and appearing randomly in some animals of this bovine population in the second half of the nineteenth century – from a (monstrous) anomaly to be eliminated into a key trait to be preserved. Consistently with a political ecology/actor-network theory approach (Bennett, 2010; Latour, 1999), we show how the current status of the Piedmontese, as a cattle breed that produces what is marketed as premium beef, is not a reflection of the animal’s genetic characteristics (see Holloway et al., 2011; Morris and Holloway, 2013). Rather, it is a matter of ‘natureculture’ (Haraway 2008; see also Latimer and Miele, 2013), that is the result of the complicated negotiations among veterinarians, livestock technicians, farmers and butchers, which have taken place from the second half of the nineteenth century to the present day. This chapter is structured into three parts. First, we follow the development of the making of the Piedmontese breed from 1886 until the late 1950s. We bring into light how an intense and heated debate between experts and breeders focused on the ‘nature’ of the breed. Second, we move on to discuss how this contested negotiation between academics and practitioners eventually ‘fixed’ the purpose and ‘nature’ of the Piedmontese as a breed for meat, through the inclusion in this bovine population of animals previously constructed as ‘anomalies’, and the exclusion of other animals beforehand considered as ‘normal’. The last part of this chapter deals with the shifting status of the Piedmontese breed from an apparently endangered local animal species in the mid-1990s into a food specialty for the cosmopolitan consumer in contemporary New York

Political science · Politics · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Geographies of human-animal interactions · animals · Biopolitics · Biopolitique · Economic aspects · Environmental aspects · Meat industry and trade · Law

  • A Relational Network Vulnerability Assessment of the North Carolina Hog Industry

    Elisabeth A Stoddard, Alida Cantor•Annals of the American…•2017

  • The politics of animal welfare

    Open Access•Renate Marie Butli Hårstad•Review of Policy Research•2024

  • Dairy intensification

    Open Access•Nathan Clay, Tara Garnett et al.•AMBIO•2020

  • Political Ecology

    Open Access•James Mccarthy, James J Mccarthy•International Encyclopedia of…•2017

  • The Worldeater(s) in Process

    Open Access•Alexander Dunlap, J Jakobsen•The Violent Technologies of…•2020

  • Animals as Wonders

    Open Access•Zheng Xinxian, Xinxian Zheng•Animals through Chinese History•2018

  • Where Did the Animals Go?

    Open Access•Francesca Bray•Animals through Chinese History•2018

  • Animals as Text

    Open Access•Martina Siebert•Animals through Chinese History•2018

  • Animals in Nineteenth-Century Eschatological Discourse

    Open Access•Vincent Goossaert•Animals through Chinese History•2018

  • Knowing Animals in China’s History

    Open Access•Daniel Schafer, Dagmar Schäfer et al.•Animals through Chinese History•2018

  • Priorities for social science and humanities research on the challenges of moving beyond animal-based food systems

    Open Access•Carol Morris, Minna Kaljonen et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • La viande

    Open Access•Michaël Bruckert•Histoire de la recherche…•2024

  • Animals through Chinese History

    Open Access•Roel Sterckx, Martina Siebert et al.•Animals through Chinese History•2018

  • Dead liveness/living deadness

    Open Access•Annalisa Colombino, Paolo Giaccaria•Environment and Planning D…•2016

  • Farming Intensification and Environmental Justice in Northern Ireland

    Open Access•Ekaterina Gladkova•Critical Criminology•2020

  • Factory farm gas

    Open Access•Stephanie Eccle•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2025

  • Valuing difference

    Open Access•C Nash•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2024

  • What’s in a name? On affect, value and the bio-economy

    Open Access•Paolo Palladino•BioSocieties•2020

  • Essential Unity of Jainism and Sustainability

    Open Access•Rajan•Journal of Human Values•2024

  • Contested rural landscapes

    Alison Caffyn•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2022

  • Alternative visions of "ethical" dairying

    Open Access•M S Thompson•Agriculture and Human Values•2022

  • Broiler battles

    Open Access•Alison Caffyn•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Geographies of meatification

    J Jakobsen, A Hansen•Globalizations•2019

  • The Foodways of the Intellectual Dark Web

    Open Access•Tina Sikka•Social Politics International…•2019

  • Strengthening the knowledge–policy interface through co-production of a climate adaptation plan

    Open Access•G Ziervogel, Emma R M Archer et al.•Environment and Urbanization•2016

  • Open Up and Say “Baa”

    Mark H Cooper•Society & Natural Resources•2017

  • The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil's national interpretation process in Ecuador

    Open Access•Adrienne Johnson•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • The Suzhi farmer

    Open Access•Kin Wing Chan, Gareth Enticott•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • The political ecology of food

    Open Access•A Moragues-Faus, Terry Marsden•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • Good methods for good farmers? Mapping the language of good farming with “diligent farmers” in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Kin Wing Chan, Gareth Enticott•Journal of Rural Studies•2023

  • Meatification and everyday geographies of consumption in Vietnam and China

    Open Access•A Hansen, J Jakobsen•Geografiska Annaler Series B…•2020

  • Urban political ecology

    Open Access•Matthew Gandy•Progress in Human Geography•2021

  • The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and transnational hybrid governance in Ecuador’s palm oil industry

    Open Access•Adrienne Johnson•World Development•2021

  • Grass-power

    Andrew Ó Murchú•Landscape Research•2023

  • The Biopolitics of Cattle Methane Emissions Reduction

    Open Access•Andrew Mcgregor, Lauren Rickards et al.•Antipode•2021

  • Taking the Politics out of Broccoli’

    Open Access•Carol Morris•Sociologia Ruralis•2017

  • Animals that feed nations and nations that feed animals

    Open Access•Guillem Rubio-Ramon•Geoforum•2025

  • Meat consumption and capitalist development

    Open Access•A Hansen•Geoforum•2018

  • Political ecology, development, and human exceptionalism

    Open Access•K Srinivasan, Rajesh Kasturirangan•Geoforum•2016

  • Cattle in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Andrew Mcgregor, Donna Houston•Transactions of the Institute of…•2017

  • Beyond happy meat

    Open Access•Heide K Bruckner•Area•2017

  • Feminist Ecologies

    Open Access•Diana Ojeda Ojeda, Padini Nirmal et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2022

  • Moralizing meat consumption

    Open Access•Heide K Bruckner, Matthias Kowasch•Policy Futures in Education•2018

  • Transhumance Revisited

    Open Access•Paolo Palladino•Journal of Historical Sociology•2018

  • Animal geographies II

    Open Access•Alice J Hovorka•Progress in Human Geography•2017

  • Animals’ mobilities

    Open Access•Timothy Hodgetts, Jamie Lorimer•Progress in Human Geography•2018

  • The production of human-wildlife conflict

    Open Access•Joseph Margulies, Jared D Margulies et al.•Geoforum•2018

  • Minilivestock’ farming

    Open Access•Rhoda Wilkie, Rhoda M Wilkie•Journal of Sociology•2018

  • Pigs, waste, and creative extraction

    Stephanie Eccle, Stephanie Eccles et al.•Local Environment•2025

  • Sleeping with the enemy

    Open Access•Yara Sleiman, Georgios Melios et al.•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • Political ecology of milk

    Open Access•Nathan Clay, Kayla Yurco•Geography Compass•2020

  • The 'brother layer problem

    Open Access•Rebecca L Rutt, J Jakobsen•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2023

  • Debating animal agriculture in contemporary India

    Open Access•K Srinivasan•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2023

  • Plugging the Pipeline

    Carlo E Sica•Annals of the American…•2018

  • Animating the urban

    Merry Barua, Maan Barua et al.•Social & Cultural Geography•2019

  • Re-animalising wellbeing

    Open Access•K Srinivasan•The Sociological Review•2022

  • A History of Pigs in China

    Open Access•Brian Lander, M Schneider et al.•The Journal of Asian Studies•2020

  • Towards a research agenda for animal and disability geographies

    Open Access•Jamie Arathoon•Social & Cultural Geography•2024

  • Confronting the Goldilocks Problem

    Open Access•Jennifer Jo Thompson, Ashley Stinnett•Culture Agriculture Food and…•2018

  • On Justification

    Open Access•Luc Boltanski, Laurent Thévenot et al.•On Justification•2021

  • Post‐Millennial Feminist Theory

    Maureen Mcneil•Journal for Cultural Research•2010

  • Genetics and livestock breeding in the UK

    Open Access•Carol Morris, Lewis Holloway•Journal of Rural Studies•2013

  • Choosing and rejecting cattle and sheep

    Open Access•Lewis Holloway, Carol Morris et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2010

  • Naturecultures? Science, Affect and the Non-human

    Open Access•Joanna Latimer, Mara Miele•Theory Culture & Society•2013

  • Are You Man Enough, Big and Bad Enough? Ecofeminism and Wolf Eradication in the USA

    Open Access•Jody Emel•Environment and Planning D…•1995

  • Biodiversity, Purity, and Death

    Open Access•C Biermann, Becky Mansfield•Environment and Planning D…•2014

  • Vibrant Matter

    Jane Bennett, Jane Foress Bennett•Vibrant Matter•2020

  • What Animals Teach Us about Politics

    Brian Massumi•What Animals Teach Us about…•2014

  • Unruly Edges

    Open Access•Anna Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing•Environmental Humanities•2012

  • From Cattle to Capital

    Open Access•R Gunderson•Critical Sociology•2013

Unique citing works59
Citations per year5,9
Citation span2016 - 2025 (10)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 56

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae