Naming, Mourning, and the Work of Earthly Coexistence

Dados Bibliográficos

ID8090743
AutoresJoshua Trey Barnett (0000-0002-6433-4232, University of Minnesota, Duluth, autor correspondente)
Ano2019
Volume13
Fascículo3
Páginas287-299
Data de publicação2019-01-24
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEnvironmental Communication (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1752-4032 • E-ISSN: 1752-4040
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17524032.2018.1561485
OpenAlexW2911365491
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas12
Referências citadas29

Setting out from Jacques Derrida’s assertion that every act of naming is “a foreshadowing of mourning” ([2008. The animal that therefore I am. (M.-L. Mallet, Ed., D. Wills, Trans.). New York, NY: Fordham University Press], p. 20), this paper argues that the work of earthly coexistence is underwritten by the intertwined practices of naming and mourning. The paper demonstrates that names provide access to and shape our perceptions of earthly entities; that the act of naming prepares us for the work of mourning; that the proper names given to endlings provide poignant points of access to species on the edge of extinction; that species names disclose species as such and, thus, enable us to grieve not just particular living organisms but entire ways of life; and that the name given to the current geological epoch, the “anthropocene,” simultaneously reflects and engenders a mode of awareness which enables us to relinquish those ways of being human that no longer seem sustainable and carry forth those that promise to enrich earthly coexistence

Aesthetics · Anthropocene · Assertion · Cognitive science · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Perception · Sociology · Work (physics · Computer Science · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism · Psychology · History · Philosophy