Social Closure
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8091163 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Juergen Mackert (University of Potsdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Publication date | 2012-08-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressNew York, NY (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0084 |
| OpenAlex | W4254788382 |
| ISBN | 9780199756384 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 31 |
Social closure” is one of the most basic terms and concepts in sociology. Basically, closure refers to processes of drawing boundaries, constructing identities, and building communities in order to monopolize scarce resources for one’s own group, thereby excluding others from using them. Society is not a homogenous entity but is instead internally structured and subdivided by processes of social closure. Some social formations, such as groups, organizations, or institutions, may be open to everybody, provided they are capable of participation, while access to most others is limited due to certain criteria that either allow people to become members or exclude them from membership. Therefore, social closure is a ubiquitous, everyday phenomenon that can be observed in almost every sphere and place in the social world. Members of societies experience closure from the very beginning of their social life. To be excluded from certain groups starts at school, where presumably homogenous classes begin to subdivide into distinct peer groups or sports teams. Here, exclusion may be rather arbitrary, but the experience of having a door slammed in one’s face proceeds in cases, where inclusion depends on formal rules or preconditions. Access to private schools follows explicit rules and depends on financial capacities; access to university depends on a certificate or diploma, eventually from certain schools only; membership in a highly prestigious club depends on economic and social capital and the respective social networks; and finally, in the case of migration, people will have to be eligible for citizenship and pass the thorny path of naturalization. However, it is not just the enormous plurality of forms that makes social closure crucial for sociology. Rather, the process of closure of social relations—of groups, organizations, institutions, and even national societies—is the fundamental process of both “communal” (Vergemeinschaftung) and “associative” relationships (Vergesellschaftung), and neither would be possible without social closure. In this broad and fundamental sense, social closure is not restricted to processes in national societies. It even allows for understanding crucial processes of the way the social world is organized at the regional or global level
Closure (psychology · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Social group · Social science · Sociology · Law · Sociology and Education Studies
Violence and Social Orders
Poor Citizens
Strategies of Social Closure in Class Formation
Geschlecht und soziale Ungleichheit
Gentrification in a Global Context
Für und wider einen weiten Begriff von Schließung. Überlegungen zur Theorie sozialer Schließung am Beispiel von Geschlechterungleichheiten
Urban Poverty and the Underclass
Homogeneity” and Constitutional Democracy
Im Auftrag des Staates. Die geheime Gesellschaft der Folterer
Social Boundary Mechanisms
Social Closure and Processes of Race/Sex Employment Discrimination
The Blind Men and the Elephant
The Rise of Advanced Marginality
A Weberian Outline of a Theory of Community
The Structure of Closure
The Ghetto of Exclusion and the Fortified Enclave
From Poverty to Perversity
Elite closure as a powerful language strategy
Exclusion, underclass, marginalidad
Patriarchy and Professions
Gentrification
The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries
Why Do Some Occupations Pay More than Others? Social Closure and Earnings Inequality in the United States
Can Class Analysis Be Salvaged
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
Insiders and Outsiders
The Stranger
The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies
The discourse of American civil society
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2023 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |