Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8091474 |
|---|---|
| Editors | Jonathan Mccollum (corresponding author), David G Hebert (0000-0003-3926-5228) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5040/9781978737266 |
| OpenAlex | W379725220 |
| ISBN | 9781978737266 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
Historical ethnomusicology is increasingly acknowledged as a significant emerging subfield of ethnomusicology due to the fact that historical research requires a different set of theories and methods than studies of contemporary practices and many historiographic techniques are rapidly transforming as a result of new technologies. In 2005, Bruno Nettl observed that “the term ‘historical ethnomusicology’ has begun to appear in programs of conferences and in publications” (Nettl 2005, 274), and as recently as 2012 scholars similarly noted “an increasing concern with the writing of musical histories in ethnomusicology” (Ruskin and Rice 2012, 318). Relevant positions recently advanced by other authors include that historical musicologists are “all ethnomusicologists now” and that “all ethnomusicology is historical” (Stobart, 2008), yet we sense that such arguments—while useful, and theoretically correct—may ultimately distract from careful consideration of the kinds of contemporary theories and rigorous methods uniquely suited to historical inquiry in the field of music. In Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology, editors Jonathan McCollum and David Hebert, along with contributors Judah Cohen, Chris Goertzen, Keith Howard, Ann Lucas, Daniel Neuman, and Diane Thram systematically demonstrate various ways that new approaches to historiography––and the related application of new technologies––impact the work of ethnomusicologists who seek to meaningfully represent music traditions across barriers of both time and space. Contributors specializing in historical musics of Armenia, Iran, India, Japan, southern Africa, American Jews, and southern fiddling traditions of the United States describe the opening of new theoretical approaches and methodologies for research on global music history. In the Foreword, Keith Howard offers his perspective on historical ethnomusicology and the importance of reconsidering theories and methods applicable to this field for the enhancement of musical understandings in the present and future
Art · Epistemology · Ethnomusicology · Literature · Musical · Sociology · Diverse Musicological Studies · Musicology and Musical Analysis · Philosophy
Towards the History of Ideas in Ethnomusicology
"Entre guerra, política e "uma visão positiva lá de casa
Sounding the Nation, Sounding the Revolution
Rethinking “musical excellence” from a decolonial perspective
Hindu Nationalism and North Indian Music in the Global Age
Methodological Issues in Transnational Music Archive Research
Walking as Fieldwork Method in Ethnomusicology
The Scholarly Ustad
Musical activity, show business and post-colonial politics in socialist Maputo, or 'the multiple sides of a full circle' (1975-1994)
A Modal Heterotopia
Between War, Politics, and “Something Nice Back Home”
From "Sin Street" to "Education Street
Insider or outsider? Exploring some digital challenges in ethnomusicology
Reavaliando o Movimento Moçambique Livre
Being a Musician in Socialist Mozambique
Cultural Brokers and the Making of Glocal Soundscapes, 1880s to 1930s
In Defence of the Term and Concept of Traditional Music
"Syriac Chant at the Negotiation of Source and Method in the Two Music-"Ologies
On Flogging the Dead Horse, Again
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,73 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |