Kant and Schelling on Blumenbach’s formative drive

Bibliographic Data

ID8093226
AuthorsNetanel Fisher (0000-0002-9475-1205, Loyola University Chicago, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume31
Issue3
Pages391-409
Publication date2021-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIntellectual History Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1749-6977 • E-ISSN: 1749-6985
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17496977.2021.1955473
OpenAlexW3193364795
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

Blumenbach’s epigenetic theory, particularly his concept of the formative drive, was appropriated by both Kant and Schelling. Kant’s third Critique endorsement of Blumenbach’s formative drive shows him to be close to Schelling’s conception of nature, since it is evidence of his distance from an artifactual conception of teleology. Schelling also draws on this concept of the formative drive, making the structures operative in the formative drive the explanatory ground of all natural forces and processes, thereby supplying the unity between the organic and inorganic which, according to Kant’s Critical philosophy, is unattainable for our discursive understanding. In this paper, I will argue for two related conclusions. First, Kant is closer to Schelling in his outlook than he has been interpreted to be, particularly in his conception of reflecting teleological judgment, according to which we must judge organisms as if they internally directed at ends, while using design as a heuristic device. Second, Schelling’s philosophy of nature expands upon Kant’s view of the teleological principle, and in doing so develops a systematically unified view of nature. For Schelling, the organizing principle manifested in the formative drive also unifies all of nature into a single system

Epistemology · Formative assessment · Philosophy of biology · Philosophy of science · Sociology · Teleology · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

Tools

Open DOI