Dissenting Heads and Hearts
Joseph Priestley, Anna Barbauld, and Conflicting Attitudes towards Devotion within Rational Dissent
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8093671 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kathryn J Ready, Kathryn Ready (University of Winnipeg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 174-190 |
| Publication date | 2010-05-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Religious History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4227 • E-ISSN: 1467-9809 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2010.00861.x |
| OpenAlex | W2118633274 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Anna Barbauld's and Joseph Priestley's disagreement on the subject of devotion was famously characterised by James Martineau as “passion for the sublime and the beautiful” confronting “passion for the truth.” Such a characterisation, however, is potentially misleading because it suggests that Barbauld lacked “passion for the truth.” At least partly, the disagreement between Barbauld and Priestley stems from a fundamentally different assessment of the limits of human knowledge (an assessment that in both cases is closely connected to a commitment to the search for truth and the associated principle of “free inquiry”). Inadvertently, Martineau not only distorts Barbauld's position within Rational Dissenting thought but also obscures a crucial split among Rational Dissenters in their approach to the search for truth
Aesthetics · Dissent · Dissenting opinion · Epistemology · Passion · Political science · Politics · Subject (documents · Sublime · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |