Aung San Suu Kyi’s defensive denial of the Rohingya massacre
A rhetorical analysis of denial and positive-image construction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8093930 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Idhamsyah Eka Putra (0000-0001-5371-7273, Universitas Persada Indonesia Yayasan Administrasi Indonesia, corresponding author), Hema Preya Selvanathan (0000-0002-6917-0951, The University of Queensland), Ali Mashuri (0000-0001-6543-8634, University of Brawijaya), Cristina Jayme Montiel (0000-0003-2793-0358, Ateneo de Manila University) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 353-369 |
| Publication date | 2021-08-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social and Political Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2195-3325 • E-ISSN: 2195-3325 |
| Publisher | PsychOpen (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.5964/jspp.7301 |
| OpenAlex | W3193738524 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 45 |
In December 2019, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accused the Myanmar government of genocide against Rohingya Muslims. Represented by Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar authorities denied such accusations. To understand how a political leader can deny ingroup wrongdoings, we unpacked Suu Kyi’s ICJ speech and analyzed her defensive rhetorical style through critical narrative analysis. We aimed to identify and describe the denial strategies Suu Kyi used as well as how she maintained a positive ingroup image to support her position. Our findings showed that Suu Kyi engaged in interpretative denial of genocide by arguing that genocide cannot occur when there is armed conflict, that there were victims and perpetrators on both sides, and that misconducts by law enforcement had been addressed. To maintain the ingroup’s positive image, she portrayed Myanmar as moral by emphasizing the government’s knowledge of ethical standards and laws, as well as their support for peace and justice. By examining political discourse used by a national leader internationally renowned for supporting human rights, our findings shed light on the dynamic, constructive nature of denial. Theoretical and applied contributions to understanding denial of ingroup wrongdoing are discussed
Criminology · Denial · Genocide · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Wrongdoing · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Examining the role of Donald Trump and his supporters in the 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol
Denying the accusation of plagiarism
Political psychology of Southeast Asia
Una herida abierta
Understanding the supporters and opponents of Myanmar's civil disobedience movement against the military coup in 2021
International Judicial Intervention and Excessive Self-immunity of the Political Community
Denial of Mass Atrocities and How Perpetrators Group Evade Accusations
Differentiated Integration Among the Stateless Rohingya in Bangladesh's Camps
The New Psychology of Leadership
Crimes of the Past
Ingroup Glorification, Moral Disengagement, and Justice in the Context of Collective Violence
Making a Virtue of Evil
When Suffering Begets Suffering
Who is to blame, the victims or the perpetrators? A study to understand a series of violence targeting the accused heretic group Ahmadiyya
Categories Are for Talking
Facing Death in Cambodia
The Discursive Construction of National Identity
Collective guilt
Genocide Denial
Inclusive Victim Consciousness in Advocacy, Social Movements, and Intergroup Relations
Discourse Analysis
Avoiding crimes of obedience
The two-sided role of inclusive victimhood for intergroup reconciliation
Beyond Precision
Identity, representations, religion, and apologizing for past wrongdoings
Representations and Discourse about Religion and Chinese Descendants in 2012 Jakarta’s Election
Turning the Tables
Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis
Well, I’m a lot of things, but I’m sure not a bigot’
Critical narrative analysis
Moral Immemorial
National Narrative and Social Psychological Influences in Turks’ Denial of the Mass Killings of Armenians as Genocide
A Politician, Not an Icon
Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields
Victim and Perpetrator Groups’ Divergent Perspectives on Collective Violence
Nuestra culpa
The Crisis of the Rohingya as a Muslim Minority in Myanmar and Bilateral Relations with Bangladesh
Rohingya Ethnic Muslim Minority and the 1982 Citizenship Law in Burma
History in the making/The making of history
Politicized collective identity
Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities
The Rohingya Refugee
Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis
The Language of "Race" and Prejudice
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |