Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Irreducibility of Progress

Kant's Account of the Relationship between Morality and History

Bibliographic Data

ID8098418
AuthorsA Honneth (0000-0002-9753-1128, Budapest School)
Year2007
Volume8
Issue1
Pages1-17
Publication date2007-02-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Horizons (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1440-9917 • E-ISSN: 1568-5160
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1558/crit.v8i1.1
OpenAlexW2046106039
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited8

In the last thirty years of his life Kant was preoccupied with the question of whether or not the "signs of progress" could be elicited from the vale of tears of the historical process. In what follows I am interested in the question of what kind of meaning Kant's historico-philosophical hypothesis of progress can have for us today. In order to provide an answer to this question, I make a distinction between system-conforming and system-bursting, or unorthodox, versions of historical progress. This distinction is made in order to show that only system-bursting versions of progress can prompt us to confer contemporary meaning on Kant's philosophy of history as a learning process that is conflict ridden and without illusions

Epistemology · Illusion · Irreducibility · Meaning (existential · Morality · Order (exchange · Philosophy of history · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Psychology · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · War, Ethics, and Justification · Philosophy

  • A Critique of Honneth’s Account of Progress from a Foucauldian Perspective

    Elena Agatensi•Critical Horizons•2025

  • Culture and the Unity of Kant’s Critique of Judgment

    Open Access•Sabina Vaccarino Bremner•Archiv für Geschichte der…•2022

  • Acting Irrespective of Hope

    Open Access•Fabian Freyenhagen•Kantian Review•2020

  • Recognition

    Open Access•A Honneth•Recognition•2020

  • Speculation, Method, and Self-Knowledge in Conjectural Beginning of Human History

    Open Access•Carlos Schoof•Kantian Review•2026

  • Beyond the Ethics of Schuld

    Joseph Wei, JOSEPH WEISS et al.•Theory & Event•2018

  • The Role of Recognition for Relational Theories of Autonomy

    Open Access•Lisa Bin•Redescriptions Political Thought…•2022

  • Progress, Self-criticism, and Normativity

    Alessandro Volpe•Critical Horizons•2025

  • Misdevelopments, Pathologies, and Normative Revolutions

    Open Access•Jörg Schaub•Critical Horizons•2015

  • Reconstructive Critique as Immanent Critique

    Luiz Repa•Critical Horizons•2023

  • Kant on revolution as a sign of moral progress

    Open Access•Sacha Golob•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2021

  • Reading Conflict of the Faculties Politically

    Open Access•Alan J Kellner•The Review of Politics•2022

  • Of persons and peoples

    Open Access•Volker Heins, Volker M Heins•Contemporary Political Theory•2010

  • Progress, emancipation, hope

    Open Access•Silvia Pierosara•Constellations•2021

  • Qu'est-ce que la critique de l'idéologie

    Rahel Jaeggi•Actuel Marx•2008

  • Secular Reason? A Minor Query about a Major Work

    A Honneth, Alex Englander•New German Critique•2022

  • Kantian Mouthliness

    Monique Roelofs•differences•2015

  • Kant

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Michael Friedman et al.•Kant•1991

  • Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Mary J Gregor•Anthropology from a Pragmatic…•1974

  • Kant and the Philosophy of History

    W H Walsh, Yirmiahu Yovel•History and Theory•1981

Unique citing works17
Citations per year0,94
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae