On Actor-Network Theory and landscape
On Actor-Network Theory and landscape
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8103364 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carrie D Allen (0000-0002-2364-9051, corresponding author), Casey D Allen |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 274-280 |
| Publication date | 2011-08-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Area (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-0894 • E-ISSN: 1475-4762 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01026.x |
| OpenAlex | W1839137289 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 35 |
Focusing primarily on the actor – human or nonhuman, individual or group, conscious or unconscious – Actor-Network Theory (ANT) explores the interconnectedness of all things. ANT recognises that all objects and things exhibit consciousness, and through a consciousness, interact heterogeneously in space; the location of the interaction(s), where they are performed homogeneously, is the landscape. If, as ANT promotes, all objects and things exhibit consciousness, then the closer in space they are to one another, the more essential they are to each other. These notions have specific ties to the on-going critique in landscape studies of focusing on rural and local scales, and the continuing debate in human (and physical) geography regarding the necessity of scale itself. Using ANT as a framework, and punctuated with true-life anecdotes, this article wraps the landscape-created-by-nature and the landscape-created-by-human debates into a non-dialectic whole, demonstrating, perhaps provocatively and controversially, that any landscape should be distinctly anti-dialectic and removed from scalar constraints. While ANT remains an often-overlooked and misunderstood technique for studying the landscape, this article's crux rests in nothing less than attempting to lay the groundwork for using ANT as a practical technique when studying any landscape in any location at any time (and in any related disciplinary field). If indeed, as argued in this paper and as ANT suggests, everything is networked, then scale, specifically when applied to any landscape, becomes irrelevant
Actor–network theory · Consciousness · Dialectic · Electromagnetic theories of consciousness · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Nothing · Sociology · Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology · Philosophy
Sport and technology
Assemblage Theory and Town Foundation in Medieval England
Georg Simmel Goes Virtual
Critical Place Studies and Middle East Histories
Street children's lives and actor-networks
Men's re-placement
The co-evolution of therapeutic landscape and health tourism in bama longevity villages, China
Friendly authoritarianism” and the bedtaun
Geography by Rail®
Placing Livestock in Landscape Studies
Los Lavadores
Feral Robotic Birds
Justice, nature, and the geography of difference
Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations
Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale
Scale and the limitations of ontological debate
Three faces of ageism
The Nature of Things
Eliminating scale and killing the goose that laid the golden egg
Considering Complexity
Dynamic Modeling, Geostatistics, and Fuzzy Classificaiton
The Socio-Spatial Dialectic
Topographic relations
Landscape connectivity
Landscape memory
Landscape
Once-upon-a-Time in the Commodity World
Pro scale
Buried Epistemologies
The Reinvention of Cultural Geography
Performance and
We Have Never Been Modern
Human geography without scale
Situating Flatness
Afterwords
A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region
The Idea of Culture
On the Embodied Nature of Action
Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,86 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2022 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |