Do No Harm in refugee humanitarian aid
The case of the Rohingya humanitarian response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8103386 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Abu Faisal Md Khaled (0000-0002-4248-5558, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-7 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Humanitarian Action (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2364-3412 • E-ISSN: 2364-3404 |
| Publisher | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-021-00093-9 |
| PMID | 38624853 |
| OpenAlex | W3133969733 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
| References cited | 29 |
The article broadly examines how humanitarian aid for Rohingya refugees inadvertently harmed poorer hosts and adversely affected local capacities for peace. The article also discusses possible ways of easing tension and improving social cohesion in the refugee-hosting areas, while also highlighting how policy- and mandate-related constraints hinder a humanitarian response anchored in the "Do No Harm" principle. Finally, the article concludes with the argument that the humanitarian agencies should not just limit themselves to identifying the unintended consequences and lapses in the intervention. Instead, the Do No Harm principle should lead humanitarian aid agencies to make an active effort to accept responsibility for the harm while taking all necessary steps to mitigate or avoid harming in future interventions.
Argument (complex analysis · Criminology · Harm · Human rights · Humanitarian aid · Humanitarian intervention · Law and economics · Mandate · Political science · Psychological intervention · Refugee · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Unintended consequences · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Cambodian History and Society · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Psychology · Law
Refugee voices vs. humanitarian choices
Dynamics of Activism and Governance in Tindouf Refugee Camps
From humanitarian crisis to burden
Differences in healthcare access between Rohingya refugees and their host community in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
Auditing Flood Vulnerability Geo-Intelligence Workflow for Biases
An assessment of gender vulnerability in the humanitarian crisis in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
Social cohesion and reconciliation between the Rohingya and host communities in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
Yemen's humanitarian collaboration during conflict
The Conflict, Climate Change, and Displacement Nexus Revisited
The right to ecology
Do No Harm
Later Is a Cis-Hetero Patriarchal Time Zone
Who Deserves Aid? Perceptions of Fairness in Contexts of Forced Displacement
Impacts of refugee influx on the local economy and environmental degradation in Bangladesh
Procedural (in)justice
In search of a Rohingya digital diaspora
The Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh
Impediments to localization agenda
Digital Diaspora Activism at the Margins
Rohingya refugee-host community conflicts in Bangladesh
Do No Harm
Economic impact of refugees
The Effect of Refugee Inflows on Host Communities
Bangladesh Poverty Assessment
Aiding Violence
Constructing ‘modern gendered civilised’ women and men
Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Urban Areas
The Consequences of Non-participatory Planning
Self-Settled Refugees and the Socio-Economic Impact of their Presence on Kassala, Eastern Sudan
Refugees in Western Tanzania
Refugees' Environmental Impact
Do refugee camps help or hurt hosts? The case of Kakuma, Kenya
Hidden Losers? The Impact of Rural Refugees and Refugee Programs on Poorer Hosts
Factors Influencing the Policy Responses of Host Governments to Mass Refugee Influxes
Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict
The Evolution of Post-conflict Recovery
Livelihoods in Conflict
Such a Long Journey
Rohingya Refugee Repatriation from Bangladesh
Can refugees benefit the state? Refugee resources and African statebuilding
Winners and Losers among a Refugee-Hosting Population
A Pebble in the Shoe
Challenge without transformation
Environmental Conflict Between Refugee and Host Communities
The Local Capacities for Peace Project
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |