Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Noumenal Causality Reconsidered

Affection, Agency, and Meaning in Kant

Bibliographic Data

ID8104048
AuthorsKenneth R Westphal (0000-0001-6039-760X, corresponding author)
Year1997
Volume27
Issue2
Pages209-245
Publication date1997-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0045-5091 • E-ISSN: 1911-0820
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1080/00455091.1997.10717478
OpenAlexW1503072472
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited18

The lead question of Kant's first Critique, indeed his whole Critical Philosophy is ‘How is Metaphysics as a Science Possible?’ Neo-Kantian and recent Anglophone interpretations of Kant's epistemology have concentrated on the ‘Transcendental Analytic’ of the first Critique, and have taken Kant's positive and legitimate sense of metaphysics to concern the necessary conditions of our knowledge of mathematics, natural science, and of course, our common sense knowledge of a spatio-temporal world of objects and events. However, in the ‘Canon of Pure Reason’ in the first Critique Kant indicates quite clearly that, although two of the leading sub-questions of metaphysics — ‘What should I so?’ and ‘What may I hope?’ — cannot be answered on theoretical grounds, they may be answered on practical grounds (A804-05=B832-33). Those practical grounds are elaborated and supplemented (mainly) in the latter two Critiques and the Religion. In each case, however, a definite and positive answer to a metaphysical question involves giving ‘objective reality’ to a concept, e.g., the concepts of freedom or immortality. ‘Objective reality’ involves possible reference to an object, where ‘possible reference’ involves more than merely describing a logical possibility

Agency (philosophy · Causality (physics · Common sense · Critical philosophy · Epistemology · Meaning (existential · Metaphysics · Object (grammar · Practical reason · Transcendental idealism · Transcendental number · Transcendental philosophy · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy

  • Comprehension Tools

    Anja Jauernig•World According to Kant•2021

  • Idealist Implications of Contemporary Science

    Open Access•Jan Westerhoff•Erkenntnis•2025

  • The World According to Kant

    Anja Jauernig•World According to Kant•2021

  • Kant's transcendental idealism

    Henry E Allison•Kant's transcendental idealism•1983

  • Kant’s Transcendental Deductions

    Eckart Förster•Kant’s Transcendental Deductions•1989

  • Kant and the Mind

    Open Access•Andrew Brook•Kant and the Mind•1994

  • On the status of ?things in themselves? in Kant

    Open Access•Nicholas Rescher•Synthese•1981

  • Kant's sensationism

    Open Access•Rolf George•Synthese•1981

  • Causality and things in themselves

    Open Access•Kent Baldner•Synthese•1988

  • A Commentary to Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason

    L P Chambers, Norman Kemp Smith•The Philosophical Review•1924

  • Affinity, Idealism and Naturalism

    Kenneth R Westphal•Kant-Studien•1997

  • Kant’s Transcendental Deduction

    Open Access•Robert Howell, Robert J Howell et al.•Kant's Transcendental Deduction•1992

  • Two Perspectives on Kant's Appearances and Things in Themselves

    Hoke Robinson•Journal of the history of…•1994

  • Kant‘s Transcendental Psychology

    Patricia Kitcher•Kant's transcendental psychology•1990

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,6
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae