Body and Space Relationship in the Research Field of Phenomenological Anthropology
Blumenberg’s Criticism of Edmund Husserl’s “Anthropology Phobia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8104703 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Volodymyr Prykhodko (0000-0003-1794-5265, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, corresponding author), Сергій Руденко (0000-0001-9069-0989, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 30-40 |
| Publication date | 2018-06-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7242 • E-ISSN: 2304-9685 |
| Publisher | Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.15802/ampr.v0i13.125512 |
| OpenAlex | W2885134037 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 3 |
Purpose. The article suggested for consideration is aimed at clarifying the shift in human perception from the spatial turn announced by Michel Foucault, to a performative turn. The performative turn has an anthropological footing. It is based on the all-round investigation of the body’s principal role for cultural existence, as a result of a reverse reaction to artificial conceptual gap between space and body, which basically means ignoring the embodiment theme. An example of such theoretical deformation was Edmund Husserl’s “anthropology phobia” revealed and thoroughly analysed by Hans Blumenberg in his critical works. Originality of the approach applied in this research, first and foremost, demonstrates not an abstract phenomenological conception as a theoretical construct, but a phenomenological activity itself, as well as practical work expressing antepredicative experience and solving the problems arising in this complicated process. Applying the Blumenberg’s analysis also allows to peep in the sideline notes of Edmund Husserl himself, which, for their part, acquire special meaning in relation to such a practical (performative) turn. Conclusions show the following state of affairs demonstrated by the anthropological and performative shift towards the body theme: 1) absolutisation of space without mentioning its relation to body experience is unreasonable and groundless, like in Husserl’s “anthropology phobia ”; 2) since the ground itself is a metaphorical anthropology basis, anthropology can reveal the structural conditions of perception due to thematic fronting of embodiment; 3) this gives anthropology some compensational features, to avoid false culture and nature dualism; 4) so, the space and body relationship is expressed by the Vehikel-phenomenon (transport phenomenon) of the body itself, by placing, arranging and depicting, and thus replacing something missing and unavailable for direct contemplation, by revealing the spatial infrastructure for object perception, creating the presence conditions and metaphorically marking the contemplation boundary; 5) the depicting arrangement (Darstellung) is at the same time a bodily performance, a play, staging and performing, which gives an aesthetic, poetic and emphatic impact on the use of philosophy language, in our case, on the way a phenomenology philosopher works with the language
Dualism · Epistemology · Performative utterance · Philosophical anthropology · Relation (database · Sociology · Theme (computing · Anthropology · Humanities and Social Sciences · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.38 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |