Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constructionism and the space of reasons

Bibliographic Data

ID8107275
AuthorsKate Mackrell (corresponding author), David Pratt (0000-0001-8843-1224), Dave Pratt (0000-0003-1659-3210)
Year2017
Volume29
Issue4
Pages419-435
Publication date2017-02-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMathematics Education Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1033-2170 • E-ISSN: 2211-050X
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s13394-017-0194-6
OpenAlexW2588722061
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited19

Constructionism, best known as the framework for action underpinning Seymour Papert’s work with Logo, has stressed the importance of engaging students in creating their own products. Noss and Hoyles have argued that such activity enables students to participate increasingly in a web of connections to further their activity. Ainley and Pratt have elaborated that learning is best facilitated when the student is engaged in a purposeful activity that leads to appreciation of the power of mathematical ideas. Constructionism gives prominence to how the learner’s logical reasoning and emotion-driven reasons for engagement are inseparable. We argue that the dependence of constructionism upon the orienting framework of constructivism fails to provide sufficient theoretical underpinning for these ideas. We therefore propose an alternative orienting framework, in which learning takes place through initiation into the space of reasons, such that a person’s thoughts, actions and feelings are increasingly open to critique and justification. We argue that knowing as responsiveness to reasons encompasses not only the powerful ideas of mathematics and disciplinary knowledge of modes of enquiry but also the extralogical, such as in feelings of the aesthetic, control, excitement, elegance and efficiency. We discuss the implication that mathematics educators deeply consider the learner’s reasons for purposeful activity and design settings in which these reasons can be made public and open to critique

Constructionism · Developmental psychology · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Sociology · Chaos, Complexity, and Education · Computer Science · Critical Realism in Sociology · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Psychology

  • Living with generative AI

    Open Access•Jimin Lee, Nancy Budwig•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • Reimagining the Philosophy of Experimentation in Chemistry Education

    Open Access•Ronald L Reyes, Jennifer D Regala•Science & Education•2026

  • Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching

    Open Access•Peter J Woods, Yasemin Copur-Gencturk•Teaching and Teacher Education•2023

  • The Formation of Reason

    Open Access•D Bakhurst•Formation of Reason•2011

  • Mind and World

    Open Access•John Mcdowell•Mind and World•1996

  • The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental

    Sebastian Gardner•Mind, reason, and being-in-the-worl…•2013

  • Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design

    Open Access•Janet Ainley, Dave Pratt et al.•British Educational Research…•2006

  • Knowledge and the Internal

    John Mcdowell•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1995

  • Knowledge and the Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons

    Robert Brandom, John Mcdowell•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1995

  • Cognition in Practice

    Open Access•Jean Lave•Cognition in Practice•1988

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae