The Good and the Right
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8107623 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael J Zimmerman (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 326-353 |
| Publication date | 2007-08-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Utilitas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0953820807002622 |
| OpenAlex | W2057042226 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 9 |
T. M. Scanlon has revived a venerable tradition according to which something's being good consists in its being such that there is a reason to respond positively towards it. He has presented novel arguments for this thesis. In this article, I first develop some refinements of the thesis with a view to focusing on intrinsic value in particular, then discuss the relation between the thesis and consequentialism, then critically examine Scanlon's arguments for the thesis, and finally turn to the question whether we should reject the thesis on the grounds that, when there is a reason to respond positively towards something, this is so because the thing in question is good. Two appendices follow. In the first, I discuss whether it is good to do right. In the second, I discuss whether an act's being wrong provides a reason not to do it
Consequentialism · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Positive economics · Relation (database · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |