Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Transforming Convivial Conservation

Towards More-Than-Human Participation in Research

Bibliographic Data

ID8108326
AuthorsSeverine Van Bommel (0000-0002-7782-9162, corresponding author), Susan Boonman-Berson (0000-0002-0876-7711)
Year2022
Volume20
Issue2
Pages136-145
Publication date2022-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0972-4923 • E-ISSN: 0975-3133
PublisherMedknow (PUBLISHER • IN)
DOI10.4103/cs.cs_29_21
OpenAlexW4285214072
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited36

Convivial conservation requires a deep structural shift in research methods and methodology. Although convivial conservation calls for moving beyond the dichotomy of the human and the non-human, this dichotomy is often reproduced in the research methods and methodologies that are used. Most (conservation) researchers have been trained to investigate what non-humans might ‘mean’ to humans, thereby inevitably silencing the voices of non-humans. This research article identifies a number of threshold concepts and methodologies by turning to multi-species work in nature conservation and challenges the historical anthropocentric framings in this field. It critically challenges the convivial conservation concept by questioning who or what is counted as a research participant from this perspective. Additionally, the article outlines different multi-species research methods and methodology and puts forward the need for threshold and promiscuous methods developed with collaboration between social and natural scientists and non-humans to bring about transformative change in conservation as envisaged by the proponents of convivial conservation. It concludes by offering ways to promote greater conviviality in nature conservation research through a more expansive sense of research participants, recognition of their inter-subjectivities, and multi-sensory communication of their situated knowledges

Anthropocentrism · Conservation science · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Expansive · Field (mathematics · Situated · Social science · Sociology · Transdisciplinarity · Transformative learning · Work (physics · Computer Science · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Artificial Intelligence · Ecology

  • Embracing the more-than-human nature of tourism impacts

    Open Access•Arie Stoffelen, Dimitri Ioannides et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2026

  • Becoming sandpeople

    Open Access•Marieke Meesters, Esther Turnhout et al.•Environment and Planning F•2026

  • Biocultural conservation as an alternative pathway for conservation

    Open Access•Natalie D L York, William Naimado et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • Convivial Constitutionality

    Open Access•T Haller•International Journal of the…•2026

  • Multispecies Constitutionality

    Open Access•Svetoslava Toncheva, J Christopher Perry et al.•International Journal of the…•2025

  • Tackling Conflicts, Supporting Livelihoods

    Open Access•Yvonne Kiki Nchanji, Sabaheta Ramcilovic‐suominen et al.•Conservation and Society•2023

  • Transdisciplinary Art and Climate Science Collaborations

    Open Access•Johanna Paschen•Geo Geography and Environment•2026

  • Potentials for animal participation

    Viktoria Hinz, M J Barrett•Journal of Organizational…•2026

  • Contemporary Wolf Hunters in the Taiga of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia)

    Open Access•Aivaras Jefanovas, Donatas Brandišauskas•Sibirica•2024

  • Being Paramuno

    Open Access•Mónica Amador-Jiménez, Naomi Millner•Society & Natural Resources•2023

  • Bad Wolves? Political Ecology of Responsibility and More-Than-Human Perspectives in Human–Wildlife Interactions

    Open Access•Sanna Komi, A Nygren•Society & Natural Resources•2023

  • A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations

    Open Access•West, L Jamila Haider et al.•Ecosystems and People•2020

  • Methods for Multispecies Anthropology

    Open Access•Heather Anne Swanson•Social Analysis•2017

  • Towards Convivial Conservation

    Open Access•Bram Büscher, Ronald Fletcher et al.•Conservation and Society•2019

  • Conservation's All about Having a Blether and Getting People on Board

    Open Access•Sam Staddon•Conservation and Society•2021

  • Shifting relations with the more-than-human

    Matthew J Barrett, Matthew Harmin et al.•Environmental Education Research•2016

  • Echoes in the dark

    Open Access•Victoria Mason, Victoria Ann Mason et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2013

  • Green Reason

    John S Dryzek•Environmental Ethics•1990

  • Elephants as companion species

    Open Access•Jamie Lorimer•Transactions of the Institute of…•2010

  • Author’s response to Jepson et al. ‘Towards an intradisciplinary bio‐geography’

    Open Access•Jamie Lorimer•Transactions of the Institute of…•2010

  • Common sensing

    Open Access•Susan Boonman-Berson, Esther Turnhout et al.•Geoforum•2016

  • Significance of affect and ethics in applying conservation standards

    Open Access•Nina V Nygren, Ari Jokinen•Geoforum•2013

  • Herding is his favourite thing in the world

    Open Access•Kelly Donati•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Animal geographies II

    Open Access•Henry Buller•Progress in Human Geography•2014

  • Ways of knowing for ‘response‐ability’ in more‐than‐human encounters

    Open Access•Katrina Brown, Rachel Dilley•Area•2011

  • Counting Corncrakes

    Open Access•Jamie Lorimer•Social Studies of Science•2008

  • Lupine Becomings—Tracking and Assembling Romanian Wolves through Multi-Sensory Fieldwork

    Kieran O’mahony, Andrea Corradini et al.•Society and Animals•2018

  • The residual humanism of hybridity

    Open Access•David Lulka•Transactions of the Institute of…•2009

  • Circulating elephants

    Open Access•Merry Barua•Transactions of the Institute of…•2013

  • Naturecultures? Science, Affect and the Non-human

    Open Access•Joanna Latimer, Mara Miele•Theory Culture & Society•2013

  • The animal boundaries of anthropology, or why don't all anthropologists consider themselves primatologists

    Karen B Strier•Reviews in Anthropology•1993

  • Urban Wild Things

    Open Access•Steve Hinchliffe, Matthew Kearnes et al.•Environment and Planning D…•2005

  • Political and ecological communication

    John S Dryzek•Environmental Politics•1995

  • Monkey business

    Jun-Han Yeo, Harvey Neo•Social & Cultural Geography•2010

  • The Theriosphere

    Roberto Marchesini•Angelaki•2016

  • On Sociology and STS

    Open Access•John Law•The Sociological Review•2008

  • Explorations in Ethnoelephantology

    Open Access•Piers Locke•Environment and Society•2013

  • Animals and the Limits of Ethnography

    Raymond Madden•Anthrozoös•2014

  • Lively Ethography

    Open Access•T Van Dooren, Deborah Bird Rose•Environmental Humanities•2016

  • Multispecies Studies

    Open Access•T Van Dooren, E Kirksey et al.•Environmental Humanities•2016

  • Methodologies for animals' geographies

    Open Access•Timothy Hodgetts, Jamie Lorimer•Cultural Geographies•2015

  • Habituating Meerkats and Redescribing Animal Behaviour Science

    Open Access•M Candea•Theory Culture & Society•2013

  • I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat

    Open Access•M Candea•American Ethnologist•2010

  • The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography

    Open Access•E Kirksey, S Eben Kirksey et al.•Cultural Anthropology•2010

  • Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions

    Open Access•A Mol•The Sociological Review•1998

Unique citing works11
Citations per year3,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae