Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kant's Synthetic and Analytic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Distinction between Philosophical and Mathematical Syntheses

Kant's Synthetic and Analytic Method

Bibliographic Data

ID8114792
AuthorsGabriele Gava (0000-0002-9568-3662, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main; Institut für Philosophie; Grüneburgplatz 1 60629 Frankfurt am Main Germany, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume23
Issue3
Pages728-749
Publication date2013-03-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0966-8373 • E-ISSN: 1468-0378
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ejop.12006
OpenAlexW2102864816
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited7

This article addresses Kant's distinction between a synthetic and an analytic method in philosophy. I will first consider how some commentators have accounted for Kant's distinction and analyze some passages in which Kant defined the analytic and the synthetic method. I will suggest that confusion about Kant's distinction arises because he uses it in at least two different senses. I will then identify a specific way in which Kant accounts for this distinction when he is differentiating between mathematical and philosophical syntheses. I will examine Kant's arguments in the Critique of Pure Reason with the latter sense of the distinction in mind. I will evaluate if he uses the analytic or the synthetic method and if the synthetic method is able to identify, without a previous consideration of some sort of given knowledge, sufficient conditions for deriving some aspects of our knowledge

Analytic philosophy · Confusion · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · Philosophical methodology · Psychoanalysis · sort · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification · Philosophy

  • Kant's Prolegomena

    Peter Thielke•Kant's Prolegomena•2021

  • Humor, Common Sense and the Future of Metaphysics in the Prolegomena

    Open Access•Michele Merritt, Melissa M Merritt•Kant's Prolegomena•2021

  • Developing cognition from its original seeds

    Open Access•Karin De Boer•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • Quid Facti Between Kant and Maimon

    Evan O’Donnell•Kant-Studien•2026

  • The “Striking Similarity” Between Kant’s Prolegomena and the Groundwork

    Open Access•Pauline Kleingeld•Kant-Studien•2026

  • Maimon's criticism of Kant's doctrine of mathematical cognition and the possibility of metaphysics as a science

    Open Access•Hernán Pringe•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018

  • Kant's transcendental idealism

    Henry E Allison•Kant's transcendental idealism•1983

  • Kant and the Claims of Knowledge

    Open Access•Paul Guyer•Kant and the Claims of Knowledge•1987

  • The Cambridge Companion to Kant

    Open Access•Paul Guyer•The Cambridge Companion to Kant•1992

  • Assessing Kant's Master Argument

    Open Access•Derk Pereboom•Kantian Review•2001

  • Kant’s Productive Imagination and its Alleged Antecedents

    Alfredo Ferrarin•Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal•1995

  • Interpreting Kant's Critiques

    Karl Ameriks•Interpreting Kant's Critiques•2003

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae