Reframing Growth
Elite Paradigms and Korea’s Green Pivot
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8130461 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sun Ryung Park (University of British Columbia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 99 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pacific Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0030-851X • E-ISSN: 1715-3379 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0030851x.2026.2629091 |
| OpenAlex | W7133857719 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 24 |
South Korea’s energy transition accelerated in 2020–2021 despite entrenched dependence on fossil fuels and nuclear power. This article argues that Korea’s green shift was not an inevitable response to structural constraints or international pressures, but the outcome of an elite-driven paradigm shift that reframed climate policy as a strategy for industrial competitiveness. External developments—including the Paris Agreement, regional peer competition, and diplomatic pressures—alongside domestic concerns over air pollution and nuclear safety, created openings for reinterpretation. Political entrepreneurship then actively channelled these shocks into a paradigmatic reframing and embedded this reorientation within the state through the Green New Deal, the 2021 Framework Act on Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth, and enhanced 2030 Nationally Determined Contributions. Although the transition was later contested under President Yoon Suk-yeol through renewed emphasis on nuclear energy and adjustments to renewable targets, key elements of the green-growth nexus persisted due to legal codification and international commitments. Comparative references to Japan and Taiwan highlight how differences in elite authority shape the timing and durability of green transitions.
Cognitive reframing · Elite · Power (physics · Asian Industrial and Economic Development · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · World Systems and Global Transformations
The Rise of “The Rest”
The Developmental State
Embedded Autonomy
How Institutions Evolve
Korea 2020 Energy Policy Review
Greening East Asia
Great Transformations
National Competitive Advantage and Energy Transitions in Korea and Taiwan
Rethinking critical juncture analysis
New Media and the Coproduction of Safety
The politics of climate change in a neo-developmental state
Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics
Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State
The Study of Critical Junctures
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Developmental Environmentalism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|