Redefining urban liveability through community voices
Insights from Kumasi’s informal settlements
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8133182 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Desmond Gagakuma (0000-0001-5801-1499, RMIT Europe, corresponding author), Glenda Mejía (0000-0003-2913-3854, RMIT Europe), Reina Ichii (0000-0003-0082-0546, RMIT Europe), José Roberto Guevara (0000-0003-2363-5087, RMIT Europe) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | City (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-4813 • E-ISSN: 1470-3629 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13604813.2026.2634527 |
| OpenAlex | W7135215057 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 43 |
This paper argues that ‘urban liveability’ is not a neutral metric but a powerful political discourse that is mobilised to advance specific urban visions while actively marginalising informal settlements. Challenging the hegemony of Western-centric frameworks that dominate urban policy, this study uses participatory methods to build a theory of liveability from the ground up, based on the lived experiences of residents in two of Kumasi, Ghana’s informal settlements—Aboabo and Suame Magazine. Our analysis reveals six interrelated dimensions that define liveability as a political claim, centred on the struggles for: essential infrastructure, economic opportunity, healthcare, environmental safety, community resilience, and housing security. These findings demonstrate that residents’ definitions of a liveable city are forged in response to systemic neglect and are rooted in collective survival rather than individualistic consumption. By foregrounding these subaltern perspectives, this research does more than fill a geographical gap; it unsettles urban theory by reframing liveability as a site of political contestation over the right to the city. The study provides a robust, critically grounded framework for scholars and advocates seeking to challenge dominant urban paradigms and centre grassroots knowledge in the pursuit of more just and equitable urban futures.
Human settlement · Informal settlements · Sustainable community · Urban planning · Urbanization · Local Economic Development and Planning · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance
Prologue/Dialogue
Saturation in qualitative research
The Urban Liveability Index
Rethinking Informality
Informality-sustainable city nexus
Developing QOL Index for Resettlement Projects of Unsafe Areas in Egypt
Interpretive Description
Recognizing, supporting and embracing the urban informal economy in Ghana
What is the meaning of urban liveability for a city in a low-to-middle-income country? Contextualising liveability for Bangkok, Thailand
Provincializing Global Urbanism
Beyond self-help
Transcending (in)formal urbanism
Victims of their own (definition of) success
Inventraset assemblages
Unlearning (Un)Located Ideas in the Provincialization of Urban Theory
African urban fantasies
Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities
Insurgent Planning
(Re)theorizing Cities from the Global South
Provincializing Urban Political Ecology
Triangulation 2.0
Debate on Global Urbanisms and the Nature of Urban Theory
Slumdog Cities
Grasping the unknowable
Informality as the Ur-Form of Urbanity
A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis
Is it hustling this world, or something else? Reflections on three engagements with Improvised Lives
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |