Animals, Ledgers of Merit and Demerit, and Karma
Religious Ecological Mechanisms in Chinese Morality Books of the Ming and Qing Dynasties
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8135136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Junhui Chen (0000-0001-5448-9532, Minzu University of China), Xinfeng Kong (Minzu University of China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 276 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel17030276 |
| OpenAlex | W7131236930 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
The article examines the religio-ecological framework articulated in Ming–Qing morality books 勸善書, focusing on how animals, Ledgers of merit 功過格, and karmic 業報 are integrated into a system of moral causality. Within this framework, actions such as killing or saving animals are directly linked to karmic reward and punishment, generating a dual mechanism that combines moral technology with an ultimate logic of justice to cultivate ecological consciousness and enforce social discipline. A central contribution of the study is the articulation of a triadic analytical framework—merit–demerit ledgers, karmic narrative, and animal ethics—showing how these elements form a coherent system of measurable and actionable ethical practice. In doing so, the framework challenges a strictly human-centered worldview by foregrounding an interconnected ecological order in which humans and animals are bound together through shared moral obligations and karmic entanglements. The article further situates this religio-ecological mechanism within contemporary debates in environmental ethics and animal rights. Through comparison with modern approaches—such as anti-speciesism, animal welfare and rights discourse, and proposals for cross-species political communities—it identifies both points of convergence and structural divergence. It concludes by exploring how this historical model might be critically translated and revised for present-day conditions, proposing a “revised morality book” framework that is more publicly defensible and more amenable to institutional implementation
Articulation (sociology · Convergence (economics · Economic Justice · Ledger · Mechanism (biology · Morality · Order (exchange · Politics · Chinese history and philosophy · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Divinanimality
A God's Own Tale
Religion & The Order of Nature
Animals through Chinese History
State, Market, and Religions in Chinese Societies
The Ledgers of Merit and Demerit
Art of Doing Good
Relational approaches to sustainability transformations
Morality Books and Taiwanese Identity The Texts of the Palace of Guidance
"A Precious Raft to Save the World" The Interaction of Scriptural Traditions and Printing in a Chinese Morality Book
Famine, migration and war
Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education
A Kantian Case for Our Obligations to the Other Animals
Nature’ in deep ecology and social ecology
Religion, Animals, and Contemplation
Tracing the Influence of Ming-Qing Buddhism in Early Modern Japan
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |