Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Filiality in Print

Material and Visual Strategies of Buddhist–Confucian Integration in the Joseon Dynasty

Bibliographic Data

ID8135276
AuthorsJin Son (0009-0007-4073-1042, Dongguk University, corresponding author), Hogui Kim (0009-0001-0837-7545, Dongguk University)
Year2026
Volume17
Issue2
Pages204
Publication date2026-02-07
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel17020204
OpenAlexW7128311353
LanguageEN
References cited9

During the Joseon Dynasty, Korean Buddhism intentionally negotiated its survival and ongoing relevance in response to the predominance of Neo-Confucian state ideology by aligning Buddhist teaching with Confucian ethical ideals, especially filial piety. This process can be clearly observed in two well-known apocryphal texts—the Bulseol daebo bumo eunjung gyeong (佛說大報父母恩重經, Eunjung gyeong) and the Bulseol jangsu myeoljoe hojedongja darani gyeong (佛說長壽滅罪護諸童子陀羅尼經, Jangsu gyeong)—whose acceptance in Joseon Korea was largely dependent on their Confucian-inspired ethical substance. This article explores how the material aspects of these texts—such as woodblock printing methods, visual programs, book formats, and meticulous colophons—operated as means for integrating Buddhist doctrinal themes with Confucian moral standards. By focusing on the 1452 woodblock editions produced at Wŏnamsa Temple, this research highlights materiality as an influential factor in enabling the visual and ritual spread of Buddhist filial ethics and thereby supporting Buddhism’s cultural legitimacy in a Confucian-dominated environment. Using a material culture lens, this study addresses a notable gap in the current research—which has typically emphasized textual interpretation at the expense of material dimensions—and offers insight into how religious groups strategically utilized materiality to adapt within changing socio-cultural contexts

Buddhism · Ideology · Interpretation (philosophy · Legitimacy · Materiality (auditing · Visual culture · Chinese history and philosophy · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Japanese History and Culture

  • Buddhist Accommodation and Appropriation and the Limits of Confucianization

    Boudewijn Walraven•Journal of Korean religions•2012

  • Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy

    Open Access•Young-chan Ro•Dao Companion to Korean Confucian…•2019

  • To Survive as a Buddhist Monk in a Confucian State

    Open Access•Yeonsik Choi Yeonsik Choi, Yeon Sik Choi•Korea Journal•2007

  • Kwanŭm (Avalokiteśvara) Divination

    Open Access•Seong U K Kim•Religions•2020

  • Syncretism, Harmonization, and Mutual Appropriation between Buddhism and Confucianism in Pre-Joseon Korea

    Open Access•Sem Vermeersch•Religions•2020

  • The Buddhist Concept of "Filial Piety" in the Context of Early Chinese Buddhist Scripture Translation

    Open Access•Jing Guo•Religions•2023

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae