Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Issue of Preventing Religious Extremism in Kazakhstan

Bibliographic Data

ID8136223
AuthorsNurlan Orynbekov (Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University), Akhmetzhanov Dastan Galymzhanovich (Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University), Bisenbayev Amanzhol Kuanbayevich (Al-Farabi Kazakh National University), Alimgozhinova Madina Serikkyzy (Al-Farabi Kazakh National University), Olzhas Karibayev (Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University), Yerkebulan Yerzhanov (0000-0001-8022-4490, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University), Ozkul Cobanoglu (0000-0002-1409-4197)
Year2026
Pages1571-1578
Publication date2026-01-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2589-1316 • E-ISSN: 2589-1316
PublisherBrighteredge Press Resources (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.64753/jcasc.v11i1.4125
OpenAlexW7119505411
LanguageEN

This article offers a comprehensive theoretical and practical analysis of the prevention of religious extremism in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study aims to provide a systematic review of state policies and domestic scholarly efforts intended to strengthen preventive measures against religious extremism. Methodologically, the research draws on the principle of systemic inquiry and employs textual analysis alongside comparative analysis. The findings indicate that Kazakhstan has approached the threat of religious extremism at the strategic level and has implemented a set of integrated measures—legal, socio-cultural, and ideological—designed to reduce vulnerability and mitigate risks. The study also demonstrates that the phenomenon of religious extremism and the mechanisms of its prevention have been actively examined within Kazakhstani philosophy, religious studies, and the social sciences. However, persistent divergences in academic perspectives and enduring gaps between theoretical approaches suggest the absence of a fully consolidated analytical framework. Against this background, the article substantiates the need to distinguish clearly between strategic (long-term, structural) and tactical (operational, applied) levels of prevention, arguing that such differentiation is essential for improving both conceptual clarity and policy effectiveness. The results may contribute to further theoretical research on religious extremism and can be used in the teaching of philosophy, religious studies, sociology, and psychology. The main scholarly contribution of the study lies in its systematic mapping of existing approaches to the prevention of religious extremism in Kazakhstan and in its conceptual proposal to differentiate prevention strategies from tactical interventions

CLARITY · Conceptual framework · Islam · Phenomenon · Set (abstract data type · State (computer science · Violent extremism · Vulnerability (computing · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae