How Far is too Far? Defining Self and Other in Religious Studies and Christian Missiology

Bibliographic Data

ID8200734
AuthorsLoren D Lybarger (corresponding author)
Year2015
Pageslfv067
Publication date2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the American Academy of Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7189 • E-ISSN: 1477-4585
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jaarel/lfv067
OpenAlexW2397151030
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited20

This article explores the limits of the debate surrounding Robert A. Orsi's call for a “third way” in scholar-practitioner encounters in religious studies research. It argues that the debate has reached an impasse and that, as Joel Robbins suggests, an alternative approach might exist within theology—particularly, theological discussions of how the Christian is to relate to the non-Christian other. The article tests this notion by probing the writings of A. Kenneth Cragg, an Anglican theologian and Islamic Studies specialist who proposed the possibility of expanding the Christian canon within the context of interfaith encounters. The article concludes that although religious studies remains, as a field, unprepared to countenance the kind of hybridization toward which Cragg's conception of the interfaith situation leads, his notion of “bi-scripturalism” has the potential nevertheless of opening up new questions for religious studies scholars concerned with alterity.

Alterity · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Missiology · Sociology · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · History · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religious studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub