On Not Operationalizing Disability in Theology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8205845 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Capretto (Vanderbilt University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 889-919 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-30 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7189 • E-ISSN: 1477-4585 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jaarel/lfx020 |
| OpenAlex | W2732154413 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 14 |
Informed by debates on the reductionism of defining disciplinary concepts in disability studies and religion, this article argues that theology faces a unique ethical and methodological challenge in whether to operationalize experiences with disability into anything theologically significant or useful. Analyzing how some scholarship in disability theology has problematically appropriated disability even for liberatory purposes, it contends that theology struggles methodologically to distinguish itself from ideological rhetoric that deliberately marginalizes persons with disability. However, rejecting operationalization not only threatens the collaboration between theology and the social sciences afforded by operationalizing shared inquiries, but risks suggesting that disability is not worthy of sustained theological attention. The article proposes that this double-bind forces theology to critique operationalization by scrutinizing its relationship to usefulness itself. This means resisting the methodological compulsion for all persons and things to become useful, and retaining the theological possibility that interpersonal experience—disabled and otherwise—may be useless.
Disability studies · Discipline · Epistemology · Ideology · Interpersonal communication · Operationalization · Political science · Politics · Reductionism · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Disability Rights and Representation · Family and Disability Support Research · Gender Studies · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Law · Philosophy
The myth of mental illness
Disability Rights and Wrongs
Crip Theory
Spirit and the Obligation of Social Flesh
Feminist, Queer, Crip
No Field Is an Island
Theses on method
Theses on Method
Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right
Extraordinary Bodies
Introspection, Empathy, and Psychoanalysis An Examination of the Relationship between Mode of Observation and Theory
The Bodymind Problem and the Possibilities of Pain
WhatIsn'tReligion
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2022 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |